3

I have a streaming replication hot-standby setup, which seems to be running all good. I can login, execute selects and the result seems to be up-to-date with the master. However in the log of the standby, I see a lot of these:

cp: cannot stat `/mnt/wal_drive/wals/0000000100004BA800000070': No such file or directory
2014-02-28 16:00:37 CET LOG:  record with zero length at 4BA8/70DD79D0
2014-02-28 16:00:37 CET LOG:  started streaming WAL from primary at 4BA8/70000000 on timeline 1
2014-02-28 16:02:59 CET FATAL:  could not receive data from WAL stream: SSL error: sslv3 alert unexpected message

What does each of these mean, and should I worry about any of them?

PS. In the master I see some of these, which I expect to be related to the SSL thing:

2014-02-28 16:10:33 CET LOG:  SSL renegotiation failure
2014-02-28 16:10:33 CET LOG:  SSL error: unexpected record

I'm running postgresql 9.3 on ubuntu 12.04

EDIT

Regarding the WAL logs I have the following setup:

On both my master and my slave I have mounted a network storage in fstab using a cifs command. The directory is chowned to be owned by the postgres user.

On my master I have the following settings in postgresql.conf:

archive_mode = on
archive_command = 'rsync -a %p /mnt/wal_drive/wals/%f </dev/null'

On the slave I have hot_standby = on and the following recovery.conf:

standby_mode = 'on'
primary_conninfo = 'host=localhost port=5433 user=replicator password=some_pass'
trigger_file = '/tmp/pgsql.trigger'
restore_command = 'cp -f /mnt/wal_drive/wals/%f %p </dev/null'
archive_cleanup_command = '/usr/lib/postgresql/9.3/bin/pg_archivecleanup /mnt/wal_drive/wals/ %r'

I have an ssh-tunnel forwarding port 5433 of the slave to port 5432 on the master, so connecting on localhost:5433 is actually the master db.

3
  • Hmmm okay do you know of any progress on this? How about the 2 others cp: cannot stat..., record with zero...? Feb 28, 2014 at 19:11
  • There's a link to a ML-archive too, in which further information from postgres side is provided. Why the cp fails I cannot tell. Maybe this is a network drive and your network is a bit sluggish? This could explain the SSL failures too... Feb 28, 2014 at 21:53

2 Answers 2

6

You appear to have two separate problems an issue with OpenSSL renegotiation.

First - nope, I was wrong, see Daniel's answer.

Second, you're being bitten by an OpenSSL issue with renegotiations. Searching for the error message would've told you this. As noted in that bug report:

Workaround is to set 'ssl_renegotiation_limit=0' in postgresql.conf

which asks PostgreSQL to tell OpenSSL to stop attempting renegotiations, since that version of OpenSSL has broken renegotiation support.

2
  • Thanks, great answer! The SSL is fixed now. Regarding the WAL logs, I do not understand why my current setup would not "work" (see EDIT)? I got the great idea of using a common storage for the wals (from you actually :-) In this post dba.stackexchange.com/questions/59675/… Mar 1, 2014 at 10:35
  • @NielsKristian You say it's CIFS, so it should work. And perhaps it is working, and the replica has just caught up to the master using logs, so there's no new log to replay. Is the current xlog position on the replica advancing when streaming replication is not connected and it's only using wal archives? Mar 2, 2014 at 0:13
5

This message:

cp: cannot stat `/mnt/wal_drive/wals/0000000100004BA800000070': No such file or directory

is just the output or the restore_command when a not-yet-existing file is requested. This is normal and documented in Archive Recovery Settings:

restore_command (string)
...

It is important for the command to return a zero exit status only if it succeeds. The command will be asked for file names that are not present in the archive; it must return nonzero when so asked.

To avoid this message, you may combine cp with test -e /path/to/file && ... to silently check for file existence in the restore_command or come up with a more elaborate script.

As for this other message:

LOG: record with zero length at 4BA8/70DD79D0

it's harmless at server start. It probably means that you copied pg_xlog from a live master, so that the newest WAL file from there is unfinished. If the WAL was in unrepairable condition, the server wouldn't start at all.

The only real problem is the SSL renegociation issue but it's answered already.

1
  • Ouch. Thankyou. I plead -ENOCOFFEE. Mar 2, 2014 at 0:14

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.