Database Administrators Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for database professionals who wish to improve their database skills and learn from others in the community. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

A bit of background. We developed an app that uses merge replication. Right now, we are currently publishing about 212 articles, and everything is fine, as it appears to fall into the 256 article count limit. (Using SQL Standard 2005 at the server, and 2005 Express at the subscriber level.)

We are in the process of developing a new version, with a new database built from the ground up, which will have a minimum system requirement of SQL 2008 R2 Standard server side and Express 2008 R2 at the client end, which also appears to have the same 256 count limit on published articles. (yes, we will also support 2012, it's limits are the same though)

The question comes in where we have successfully test published out over 400 articles in the new version, and everything tests functionally (pub creation, snapshot and subscriber creation, and replication itself). Has anyone else exceeded the count limit before, and is this just a soft recommended limit? We have not seen any errors, either during publication creation, or subscriber creation.

According to this article:

I'm waiting on a call back from Microsoft, but I'd like to know if anyone has seen this before, in any ver of SQL.

share|improve this question

migrated from Sep 24 '12 at 16:58

This question came from our site for system and network administrators.

One of our projects started with merge replication on our entire database of ~675 tables. The publication and subscriptions appeared to work, but we didn't get as far as testing (we switched to Peer-to-Peer). It's possible the documentation is incorrect. – Jon Seigel Sep 24 '12 at 16:57
Did you get any word back from MS on this? I have a question about this too.… to me it seems to be because of a bug from the past, and it doesn't appear to be an actual limit anymore, but I want to be sure before recommending this be done in production. – peter Oct 15 '12 at 3:18

I have now Merge replication setup with 666 Table Articles in production, and I didn't get any warning or errors regarding articles limit.

share|improve this answer

I hitted in past with SQLServer 2008 (not R2). Microsoft said: It's an hard limit. There is no way to overcome it.

share|improve this answer
I would think that if it was a hard limit, it would have failed for us at 400 articles. – DanBig May 21 '13 at 16:03

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.