If you want a painful way to prove what @gbn is saying (essentially that you can't tell a collation to order substrings differently), you can make a quick #temp table that has a coefficient for the order you expect, and see if ordering by any collation returns the same order:
CREATE TABLE #foo(id INT, n NVARCHAR(10));
CREATE TABLE #bar(collation SYSNAME);
SET NOCOUNT ON;
INSERT #foo SELECT 1,'1'
UNION SELECT 2,'2'
UNION SELECT 3,'3'
UNION SELECT 4,'6'
UNION SELECT 5,'10'
UNION SELECT 6,'10A'
UNION SELECT 7,'10B'
UNION SELECT 8,'11';
DECLARE @sql NVARCHAR(MAX) = N'';
SELECT @sql += N'
WITH x AS
(
SELECT n, rn = ROW_NUMBER() OVER
(ORDER BY n COLLATE ' + name + ') FROM #foo
)
INSERT #bar
SELECT TOP (1) ''' + name + ''' FROM x
WHERE NOT EXISTS
(
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM #foo AS f
WHERE f.id = x.rn
AND f.n <> x.n
);' FROM sys.fn_helpcollations();
EXEC sp_executesql @sql;
SELECT collation FROM #bar;
GO
DROP TABLE #foo, #bar;
This runs for me in about 10 seconds and yields 0 rows - meaning no collation available to SQL Server (at least 2008 R2, haven't tried Denali) will sort in the way you expect. You need a different way to define sorting.