Take the 2-minute tour ×
Database Administrators Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for database professionals who wish to improve their database skills and learn from others in the community. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I see from the thread Which tools and technologies build the Stack Exchange Network? that the database specifications are:

Database SQL Server 2008 R2 running Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Enterprise Edition x64

While this does not necessarily mean that Oracle wont do this job, it does indicate that it is not as good for this part.

How far is it true? What are the reasons?

share|improve this question
add comment

closed as not constructive by jcolebrand, Sathya, bernd_k, xenoterracide, Brian Ballsun-Stanton Jan 10 '11 at 0:20

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

3 Answers

up vote 10 down vote accepted

It just means that the developers were more familiar with the Microsoft stack.

share|improve this answer
4  
Most of the time companies and people select one platform over another because they are more familiar with one that another. –  mrdenny Jan 8 '11 at 0:39
    
The co-founders of Stackoverflow are Joel Spolsky, who worked for Microsoft (and wrote VBA for Excel), and Jeff Atwood, who started as a hacker using MS Basic. –  Neil McGuigan Apr 28 '13 at 7:57
add comment

They also signed up as Biz Spark customers so they got all the Microsoft licenses for free for the first few years (as long as they stay members of the program).

share|improve this answer
    
The familiarity thing was probably the reason, but you are right in that Biz Spark could have made that decision much earlier to justify! –  David Spillett Jan 8 '11 at 0:51
    
Oracle lacks a program like BizSpark or DreamSpark, and thus tends to get ignored by start ups because Oracle licenses are quite expensive. –  Tangurena Jan 8 '11 at 16:16
add comment

Is PHP not well suited to writing websites? The didn't write StackOverflow with it so it must not be any good.

I imagine the MySQL/PHP devs on SO would love to argue that with you. It really was a matter of taste. Are you aware that Oracle has it's own webserver of sorts built in? (it's based on Apache).

Do you see where this is going? I get your point, but I think the question is just very poorly worded. I'm open to helping you work on it, and that's why I made an answer and not a comment, but for now, VtC.

share|improve this answer
    
Actually, yes, it is a sign that's PHP isn't any good for writing websites. And they didn't write it in shell, either. (I had someone ask me to put a shell script CGI on one of my servers earlier this year, and didn't understand why I reacted how I did) –  Joe Jan 8 '11 at 3:48
    
By that logic... what am I saying! That is no logic. At all. –  Jürgen A. Erhard Jan 9 '11 at 20:34
    
@jae ~ I understand, I just wanted to point out the futility of the question when I posted this answer. I really don't expect this answer to remain non-downvoted. –  jcolebrand Jan 10 '11 at 5:32
    
@jcolebrand sorry, should have put an @Joe, because I replied to him. Sorry again for the confusion. –  Jürgen A. Erhard Jan 10 '11 at 12:21
    
@jcolebrand though I personally do think that MySQL/PHP isn't any good for writing websites. I also do know that it's a gut feeling (hate PHP with a passion) and not a logical argument. ;-) –  Jürgen A. Erhard Jan 10 '11 at 12:23
show 1 more comment

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.