2
votes
1answer
50 views

Implementing application locks within SQL Server (Distributed Locking Pattern)

In my application I have to perform a distributed locking pattern. Because we already have an instance of SQL Server to use, we decided that it would be easiest to implement the locking at SQL layer ...
5
votes
1answer
243 views

Why are U locks required when using Read Committed Snapshot Isolation

I consider myself a beginner at Sql Server locking. My understanding is that when using RCSI, Sql Server doesn't need to issue S locks because it uses row versioning (in most cases). From ...
2
votes
0answers
187 views

SQL Server - Same query, same database, different results [closed]

I have a database in SQL Server 2008 with 2 tables. I'm running the following query on Management Studio: select M.FD_BROWSER_SHORT_NAME AS X, Count(1) AS Y from TB_EVENTS E INNER JOIN ...
1
vote
1answer
65 views

How, when and why does implicit changing of transaction isolation level happen?

RCSI (Read Committed Snapshot Isolation) is the setting of a database changing the behavior of (the default) Read Committed isolation level in SQL Server. This is, as I understand, the context of ...
1
vote
0answers
33 views

Does SQL Server place shared locks on scanned records when using REPEATABLE READ [duplicate]

Assume a SQLCmd session which is using transaction isolation level REPEATABLE READ. In this session I start a transaction and execute an UPDATE statement with a WHERE clause on a non indexed column. ...
0
votes
0answers
86 views

What would this non-'unique index with a unique search condition` query lock?

I am not sure about this part of the transaction manual For locking reads (SELECT with FOR UPDATE or LOCK IN SHARE MODE), UPDATE, and DELETE statements, locking depends on whether the statement ...
6
votes
4answers
2k views

MySQL InnoDB locks primary key on delete even in READ COMMITTED

Preface Our application runs several threads that execute DELETE queries in parallel. The queries affect isolated data, i.e. there should be no possibility that concurrent DELETE occurs on the same ...
3
votes
1answer
1k views

How to force the use of row locks?

I am trying to get my table to use row locks. I have already disabled lock escalation. The isolation level is READ_COMMITTED_SNAPSHOT alter table <TABLE_NAME> SET (LOCK_ESCALATION=DISABLE) go ...
4
votes
2answers
293 views

Schema blocking in READ_COMMITTED_SNAPSHOT

I am trying to troubleshoot locking behavior and the READ_COMMITTED_SNAPSHOT isolation level while attempting to resolve concurrency issues. Background: Assume an online ordering system (ecommerce). ...
16
votes
3answers
3k views

Managing concurrency when using SELECT-UPDATE pattern

Let's say you have the following code (please ignore that it's awful): BEGIN TRAN; DECLARE @id int SELECT @id = id + 1 FROM TableA; UPDATE TableA SET id = @id; --TableA must have only one row, ...
6
votes
3answers
2k views

SQL Server - what isolation level for non-blocking select statements?

I have a long running transaction (called, say, T1) that performs some deletes, updates and inserts on a table in SQL Server 2008 R2. At the same time, another process periodically runs select ...