Reputation
266
Top tag
Next privilege 300 Rep.
Create tags
Badges
6 15
Impact
~29k people reached

  • 0 posts edited
  • 0 helpful flags
  • 24 votes cast
Feb
8
awarded  Notable Question
Feb
6
awarded  Notable Question
Jan
14
awarded  Notable Question
Jan
2
accepted transactions and Oracle dblink
Jan
2
answered transactions and Oracle dblink
Dec
27
comment transactions and Oracle dblink
Well, right, it doesn't make sense and yet we are seeing it! The settings are MANUAL and 0; I am not sure what to look for in V$RESULT_CACHE_...
Dec
27
revised transactions and Oracle dblink
edited title
Dec
26
comment transactions and Oracle dblink
OK, I think I've made this perfect now.
Dec
26
revised transactions and Oracle dblink
added 200 characters in body
Dec
26
comment transactions and Oracle dblink
@miracle173 I did what I could, pretty much everything short on the table schema. I'll play with it tomorrow.
Dec
26
revised transactions and Oracle dblink
deleted 317 characters in body
Dec
25
revised transactions and Oracle dblink
added 349 characters in body
Dec
25
revised transactions and Oracle dblink
added 170 characters in body
Dec
25
comment transactions and Oracle dblink
You mean actual SQL?
Dec
24
asked transactions and Oracle dblink
Nov
27
awarded  Popular Question
Oct
20
awarded  Revival
Oct
20
awarded  Teacher
Oct
20
accepted ORA-02070: database does not support antijoin in this context
Oct
20
answered ORA-02070: database does not support antijoin in this context