Reputation
2,126
Top tag
Next privilege 2,500 Rep.
Create tag synonyms
Badges
2 14 32
Newest
 Yearling
Impact
~170k people reached

Oct
4
comment Doing a point in time restore with CDC enabled; Possible?
You know what... I just had an epiphany... do a full restore with keep_cdc on the new box. That will build cdc out, then start you multi file restore over the top of it without keep_cdc to do your point in time recovery. Ok, I'm squared away now.
Oct
4
revised Doing a point in time restore with CDC enabled; Possible?
added 36 characters in body
Oct
4
comment Doing a point in time restore with CDC enabled; Possible?
So restoring to a different database, a new database, or a database that will be a mirroring partner is still a no? I read this same article but it left me wondering about the scenarios above in a multi file scenario.
Oct
4
revised Doing a point in time restore with CDC enabled; Possible?
added 15 characters in body
Oct
4
revised Doing a point in time restore with CDC enabled; Possible?
added 131 characters in body
Oct
4
asked Doing a point in time restore with CDC enabled; Possible?
Sep
29
awarded  Popular Question
Sep
11
revised Does SQL manage foreign key constraints in terms of Insertion?
added 4 characters in body
Aug
23
awarded  Popular Question
Jul
31
revised Location of Maintenance Plan's Back Up Database Tasks information (SQL Server 2005)
added 9 characters in body
Jun
15
awarded  Popular Question
May
15
awarded  Caucus
May
1
awarded  Enlightened
May
1
awarded  Nice Answer
Apr
27
awarded  Yearling
Apr
13
awarded  Nice Question
Mar
21
comment Upgrade SQL Server 2012 Express to Evaluation Edition
Yeah, sharepoint install makes it a little more fragile for sure.
Mar
21
comment Upgrade SQL Server 2012 Express to Evaluation Edition
How many databases on your express install? How much work to backup, install fresh, and restore?
Mar
8
comment Delete a variable number of records by a chronological order
Also, I was trying to get around deprecation with the sub select but it's a nil issue now. Thanks again.
Mar
8
accepted Delete a variable number of records by a chronological order