network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 2 months |
| seen | Mar 4 at 21:00 | |
| stats | profile views | 1 |
|
Mar 1 |
answered | Database Design - different objects with shared tagging |
|
Feb 27 |
awarded | Student |
|
Feb 26 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Feb 26 |
comment |
Special ordering Yep, that solves the issue. Thanks; this is my first time arround, Next time I'll try to use more propper tools to explain... I already saved the URL to add a SQL Fiddle |
|
Feb 26 |
accepted | Special ordering |
|
Feb 26 |
comment |
Special ordering yes, it vareies but it can have up to 5 levels that I've seen and the system that uses it can go beyond 5. |
|
Feb 26 |
awarded | Custodian |
|
Feb 26 |
reviewed | Approve suggested edit on Special ordering |
|
Feb 26 |
comment |
Special ordering In the end I expect to have something like this; the child item with id 151 should go after the parent item 146. |
|
Feb 26 |
comment |
Special ordering Oracle 9i and 10g... I have this same behavior in both versions |
|
Feb 26 |
asked | Special ordering |
