| bio | website | DeveloperTipOfTheDay.com |
|---|---|---|
| location | United Kingdom | |
| age | 28 | |
| visits | member for | 1 year, 9 months |
| seen | Mar 22 at 9:41 | |
| stats | profile views | 3 |
Web developer based in the UK, working at Learning Resources International, www.lri.co.uk
|
Jan 29 |
comment |
Tuning reads (or perhaps the truncate!) for unusual database structure requiring regular truncates Hi @AlexKuznetsov I looked at the ALTER TABLE ... SWITCH which I believe is using partitions (I think)? |
|
Jan 29 |
comment |
Tuning reads (or perhaps the truncate!) for unusual database structure requiring regular truncates Interesting, thanks for the link @Remus - I've not come across that page before. Did you see Aaron's edited post, what do you think? |
|
Jan 29 |
awarded | Commentator |
|
Jan 29 |
comment |
Tuning reads (or perhaps the truncate!) for unusual database structure requiring regular truncates Thanks @Remus a handy shunt back to reality. It's good to know the possible side effects. Would it be possible to use table hints on the reads to help mitigate this - maybe allowing dirty reads (dirty reads are ok for the table's use)? We certainly have to fix the overall problem, but looking for workarounds to by time to a proper refactor. |
|
Jan 24 |
comment |
Tuning reads (or perhaps the truncate!) for unusual database structure requiring regular truncates Wowzer, that's a different realm of size of DB compared to ours (tiny in comparison)! But good to know the transaction logs is ok, thanks for the additional detail. |
|
Jan 24 |
comment |
Tuning reads (or perhaps the truncate!) for unusual database structure requiring regular truncates Thanks Simon, good idea. How did you find that effected your transaction log? Was it ok? We may have to do this an number of times a day. How many rows were you deleting? |
|
Jan 24 |
comment |
Tuning reads (or perhaps the truncate!) for unusual database structure requiring regular truncates Ah ok, so a double switch. Good idea. How does this effect reads? Will the reads still go to the original table whilst this is happening? |
|
Jan 24 |
comment |
Tuning reads (or perhaps the truncate!) for unusual database structure requiring regular truncates Thanks Martin, that's an interesting idea. I've not heard of that before. Looking at MSDN the receiving table needs to be empty first, but perhaps used with Simon's answer it could be good. |
|
Jan 24 |
asked | Tuning reads (or perhaps the truncate!) for unusual database structure requiring regular truncates |
|
Jan 11 |
awarded | Citizen Patrol |
|
Jan 11 |
comment |
Reset / force SQL Agent Next run date Thanks for the idea, shame next_run_date isn't datetime. |
|
Jan 11 |
comment |
Reset / force SQL Agent Next run date Hi @AaronBertrand I must admit I wasn't counting. But looking at my Last Run date (from when I last ran it manually) it's been about 40 minutes, so looks like it didn't fix itself. |
|
Jan 11 |
asked | Reset / force SQL Agent Next run date |
|
Dec 5 |
comment |
Generate insert statements for table AND related data Thanks Kevin, good point on the order of the inserts. I suppose the order doesn't matter, I suppose it's the discover-ability of the related data and writing all the INSERT statements out. |
|
Dec 5 |
comment |
Generate insert statements for table AND related data Hi @Kevin Feasel I've added a little example to my question. |
|
Dec 5 |
revised |
Generate insert statements for table AND related data added example to copying fk / pk |
|
Dec 5 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Dec 5 |
revised |
Generate insert statements for table AND related data added 127 characters in body |
|
Dec 5 |
comment |
Generate insert statements for table AND related data Thanks @Kevin Feasel +1 from me. What I'm really hoping for is the ability to generate the inserts to tie up the FK / PK when doing the insert. I'll update the question text. |
|
Dec 5 |
awarded | Student |