| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | Netherlands | |
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 5 months |
| seen | 5 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 38 |
Enthusiast programmer!
|
1d |
awarded | Constituent |
|
May 14 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
May 13 |
awarded | Caucus |
|
Apr 25 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Dec 16 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Dec 12 |
comment |
grant permission Are you trying to grant permissions on myTable as user dummyRole? Not enough information in the question as it is now to help you further... |
|
Dec 12 |
revised |
Solve conflict between affinity mask and I/O affinity mask? updated the question with the way I solved the problem in the end |
|
Dec 11 |
accepted | Solve conflict between affinity mask and I/O affinity mask? |
|
Dec 11 |
comment |
Solve conflict between affinity mask and I/O affinity mask? Great answer, thanks a lot for your explanation! I will read up on this. It's not an option I configured myself, I just encountered it on one of our machines and wanted to know what's behind it. |
|
Dec 11 |
revised |
Solve conflict between affinity mask and I/O affinity mask? slight edits |
|
Dec 11 |
revised |
Solve conflict between affinity mask and I/O affinity mask? added tag |
|
Dec 11 |
asked | Solve conflict between affinity mask and I/O affinity mask? |
|
Oct 5 |
awarded | Excavator |
|
Oct 5 |
revised |
Why is it a bad practice to allow everyone to use the sa login? fixed broken link |
|
Oct 5 |
suggested | suggested edit on Why is it a bad practice to allow everyone to use the sa login? |
|
Oct 5 |
comment |
Still wrong to start the name of a user stored procedure with sp_? Interesting finds, thanks! I'll use your example in combination with Aaron's example to run some more tests. |
|
Oct 5 |
accepted | Still wrong to start the name of a user stored procedure with sp_? |
|
Oct 5 |
comment |
Still wrong to start the name of a user stored procedure with sp_? Thanks for your answer, very useful addition on the prevalence of master sp's. |
|
Oct 5 |
comment |
Still wrong to start the name of a user stored procedure with sp_? Great example, thanks Aaron. I'm still testing it on 2008 R2 (and probably testing it the wrong way, cause 'dbo.wrapper_sp1' and 'dbo.wrapper_sp2' seem significantly faster than the other two right now). |
|
Oct 4 |
revised |
Still wrong to start the name of a user stored procedure with sp_? made edit (and questions) more clear |