meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 2 years, 3 months |
| seen | May 15 at 16:09 | |
| stats | profile views | 84 |
|
May 10 |
awarded | Notable Question |
|
Apr 7 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Feb 11 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Dec 21 |
comment |
Generating an arithmetic sequence interesting idea... would definitely work, though I think I preferred Vincent's answer for this one, thanks. |
|
Dec 21 |
comment |
Generating an arithmetic sequence Thanks, the CONNECT BY was exactly what I was trying to find. |
|
Dec 21 |
accepted | Generating an arithmetic sequence |
|
Dec 20 |
comment |
Generating an arithmetic sequence thanks, let me check it out & see... |
|
Dec 20 |
revised |
Generating an arithmetic sequence deleted 4 characters in body |
|
Dec 20 |
revised |
Generating an arithmetic sequence added 29 characters in body |
|
Dec 20 |
asked | Generating an arithmetic sequence |
|
Dec 12 |
revised |
Select Count(*) FROM with-clause-named table order by a, b not working added 398 characters in body |
|
Dec 12 |
accepted | Select Count(*) FROM with-clause-named table order by a, b not working |
|
Dec 12 |
comment |
Select Count(*) FROM with-clause-named table order by a, b not working actually this may be working after initially testing it and asking only for columns defined in the group by... let me try to complete the whole query and let you know if it works... Thanks! |
|
Dec 12 |
comment |
Select Count(*) FROM with-clause-named table order by a, b not working yes there are more columns in the derived table t. Do I need to do something with with the group by ColumnC, ColumnD? Let me try that out... |
|
Dec 12 |
revised |
Select Count(*) FROM with-clause-named table order by a, b not working added 6 characters in body |
|
Dec 12 |
revised |
Select Count(*) FROM with-clause-named table order by a, b not working added 4 characters in body |
|
Dec 12 |
asked | Select Count(*) FROM with-clause-named table order by a, b not working |
|
Oct 24 |
comment |
Simple query with date type requires explicit conversion to_date of date Thank you for the contribution as well, in the final query version, have noted the intricacy of the midnight setting of the to_date... the major issue was that the table had a fundamentally outdated date formatting style... |
|
Oct 24 |
comment |
Simple query with date type requires explicit conversion to_date of date you know, a lot of programmers now were not around to fix programming issues in 2000.... So I foresee a repeat in 2100, good eye. |
|
Oct 24 |
revised |
Simple query with date type requires explicit conversion to_date of date added 719 characters in body |
