Timeline for Chance of duplicate on single select max into statement
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2015 at 6:51 | vote | accept | Ascendant | ||
| Dec 7, 2015 at 2:25 | history | edited | Ascendant | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 383 characters in body
|
| Dec 7, 2015 at 2:21 | answer | added | Justin Cave | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 7, 2015 at 2:21 | comment | added | Ascendant | I was told by my superior to use the approach above. I would have to tell him why a sequence is better than his approach. So I asked this question and specifically, question #3. Also, technically, I'm not allowed to modify their database. I only asserted my feeling of impending doom but I don't have the knowledge to prove. | |
| Dec 7, 2015 at 2:11 | comment | added | Mr.Brownstone | is there a reason you can't use the actual sequence to generate the SM_SEQ value? | |
| Dec 7, 2015 at 1:31 | history | asked | Ascendant | CC BY-SA 3.0 |