Skip to main content
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
Source Link

In SSMS 2016, Navigate To... is gone.

So the answer is that temporary presence of non-functioning Navigate To... feature in SSMS 2014 looks like forgotten artifact of adopting SSMS to Visual Studio platform. Perhaps we should seek nothing more serious behind it.

Comment: SSMS 2016 seems to be much more polished, it fixes many weird technical and design errors seen in SSMS 2014, including non-standard keyboard shortcuts. After leaving good SSMS 2008 and 3-of-5-stars experience with SSMS 2014 I recommend installing standalone SSMS 2016, which can get 4.5. They even can be installed and used side-by-side, if someone is hesitant to uninstall that 2014 thing on the first day. So far, I found only one issueone issue with SSMS 2016.

In SSMS 2016, Navigate To... is gone.

So the answer is that temporary presence of non-functioning Navigate To... feature in SSMS 2014 looks like forgotten artifact of adopting SSMS to Visual Studio platform. Perhaps we should seek nothing more serious behind it.

Comment: SSMS 2016 seems to be much more polished, it fixes many weird technical and design errors seen in SSMS 2014, including non-standard keyboard shortcuts. After leaving good SSMS 2008 and 3-of-5-stars experience with SSMS 2014 I recommend installing standalone SSMS 2016, which can get 4.5. They even can be installed and used side-by-side, if someone is hesitant to uninstall that 2014 thing on the first day. So far, I found only one issue with SSMS 2016.

In SSMS 2016, Navigate To... is gone.

So the answer is that temporary presence of non-functioning Navigate To... feature in SSMS 2014 looks like forgotten artifact of adopting SSMS to Visual Studio platform. Perhaps we should seek nothing more serious behind it.

Comment: SSMS 2016 seems to be much more polished, it fixes many weird technical and design errors seen in SSMS 2014, including non-standard keyboard shortcuts. After leaving good SSMS 2008 and 3-of-5-stars experience with SSMS 2014 I recommend installing standalone SSMS 2016, which can get 4.5. They even can be installed and used side-by-side, if someone is hesitant to uninstall that 2014 thing on the first day. So far, I found only one issue with SSMS 2016.

added 9 characters in body
Source Link
miroxlav
  • 343
  • 3
  • 10

In SSMS 2016, Navigate To... is gone.

So the answer is that temporary presence of non-functioning Navigate To... feature in SSMS 2014 looks like forgotten artifact of adopting SSMS to Visual Studio platform. Perhaps we should seek nothing more serious behind it.

Comment: SSMS 2016 isseems to be much more polished, it fixes many weird technical and design errors seen in SSMS 2014, including non-standard keyboard shortcuts. After leaving good SSMS 2008 and 3-of-5-stars experience with SSMS 2014 I recommend installing standalone SSMS 2016, which can get 4.5. They even can be installed and used side-by-side, if someone is hesitant to uninstall that 2014 thing on the first day. So far, I found only one issue with SSMS 2016.

In SSMS 2016, Navigate To... is gone.

So the answer is that temporary presence of non-functioning Navigate To... feature in SSMS 2014 looks like forgotten artifact of adopting SSMS to Visual Studio platform. Perhaps we should seek nothing more serious behind it.

Comment: SSMS 2016 is much more polished, it fixes many weird technical and design errors seen in SSMS 2014, including non-standard keyboard shortcuts. After leaving good SSMS 2008 and 3-of-5-stars experience with SSMS 2014 I recommend installing standalone SSMS 2016, which can get 4.5. They even can be installed and used side-by-side, if someone is hesitant to uninstall that 2014 thing on the first day. So far, I found only one issue with SSMS 2016.

In SSMS 2016, Navigate To... is gone.

So the answer is that temporary presence of non-functioning Navigate To... feature in SSMS 2014 looks like forgotten artifact of adopting SSMS to Visual Studio platform. Perhaps we should seek nothing more serious behind it.

Comment: SSMS 2016 seems to be much more polished, it fixes many weird technical and design errors seen in SSMS 2014, including non-standard keyboard shortcuts. After leaving good SSMS 2008 and 3-of-5-stars experience with SSMS 2014 I recommend installing standalone SSMS 2016, which can get 4.5. They even can be installed and used side-by-side, if someone is hesitant to uninstall that 2014 thing on the first day. So far, I found only one issue with SSMS 2016.

added 92 characters in body
Source Link
miroxlav
  • 343
  • 3
  • 10

In SSMS 2016, Navigate To... is gone.

So the answer is that temporary presence of non-functioning Navigate To... feature in SSMS 2014 looks like forgotten artifact of adopting SSMS to Visual Studio platform. Perhaps we should seek nothing more serious behind it.

Comment: SSMS 2016 is much more polished, it fixes many weird technical and design errors seen in SSMS 2014, including non-standard keyboard shortcuts. After leaving good SSMS 2008 and 3-of-5-stars experience with SSMS 2014 I recommend installing SSMS 2016standalone SSMS 2016, which can get 4.5. They even can be installed togetherand used side-by-side, if someone is hesitant to uninstall that 2014 thing on the first day. So far, I found only one issue with SSMS 2016.

In SSMS 2016, Navigate To... is gone.

So the answer is that temporary presence of non-functioning Navigate To... feature in SSMS 2014 looks like forgotten artifact of adopting SSMS to Visual Studio platform. Perhaps we should seek nothing more serious behind it.

Comment: SSMS 2016 is much more polished, it fixes many weird technical and design errors seen in SSMS 2014, including non-standard keyboard shortcuts. After leaving good SSMS 2008 and 3-of-5-stars experience with SSMS 2014 I recommend installing SSMS 2016, which can get 4.5. They even can be installed together, if someone is hesitant to uninstall that 2014 thing on the first day.

In SSMS 2016, Navigate To... is gone.

So the answer is that temporary presence of non-functioning Navigate To... feature in SSMS 2014 looks like forgotten artifact of adopting SSMS to Visual Studio platform. Perhaps we should seek nothing more serious behind it.

Comment: SSMS 2016 is much more polished, it fixes many weird technical and design errors seen in SSMS 2014, including non-standard keyboard shortcuts. After leaving good SSMS 2008 and 3-of-5-stars experience with SSMS 2014 I recommend installing standalone SSMS 2016, which can get 4.5. They even can be installed and used side-by-side, if someone is hesitant to uninstall that 2014 thing on the first day. So far, I found only one issue with SSMS 2016.

Source Link
miroxlav
  • 343
  • 3
  • 10
Loading