Timeline for Can two primary AlwaysOn servers be each other's secondary--for completely seperate sets of databases?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2020 at 9:05 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Jan 10, 2019 at 4:19 | vote | accept | Sting | ||
| Oct 29, 2018 at 17:17 | answer | added | Tony Hinkle | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 29, 2018 at 17:10 | review | Close votes | |||
| Oct 30, 2018 at 8:26 | |||||
| Oct 29, 2018 at 14:14 | comment | added | Randi Vertongen | One of the drawbacks to this setup could be that you can save money on your licensing costs by only licensing one 'active' host. Doing this will mean that you can only do production tasks on the active server. | |
| Oct 29, 2018 at 14:00 | history | edited | Paul White♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Oct 29, 2018 at 13:58 | history | edited | Sting | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 150 characters in body
|
| Oct 29, 2018 at 13:53 | history | undeleted | Sting | ||
| Oct 29, 2018 at 13:53 | history | deleted | Sting | via Vote | |
| Oct 29, 2018 at 13:52 | history | asked | Sting | CC BY-SA 4.0 |