Skip to main content
Incorporated details left in comments.
Source Link
MDCCL
  • 8.5k
  • 3
  • 31
  • 62

Suppose we are writing an enhanced entity-relationship diagram (EERD) for a company's database. This company offers two services A and B. If the two services were disjoint, then this might look something like:

enter image description here

In many cases you could request both services from the company, in which case we would use an "o" instead of a "d".

A person cannot request service B by itself. A person can request services as often as they want. But it's highly unlikely anyone would request services more than once every 10 years or so.

Suppose that for this company, you can either request service A and B together, or service A only. What is a good way to describe this constraint succinctly in the diagram?

Suppose we are writing an enhanced entity-relationship diagram (EERD) for a company's database. This company offers two services A and B. If the two services were disjoint, then this might look something like:

enter image description here

In many cases you could request both services from the company, in which case we would use an "o" instead of a "d".

Suppose that for this company, you can either request service A and B together, or service A only. What is a good way to describe this constraint succinctly in the diagram?

Suppose we are writing an enhanced entity-relationship diagram (EERD) for a company's database. This company offers two services A and B. If the two services were disjoint, then this might look something like:

enter image description here

In many cases you could request both services from the company, in which case we would use an "o" instead of a "d".

A person cannot request service B by itself. A person can request services as often as they want. But it's highly unlikely anyone would request services more than once every 10 years or so.

Suppose that for this company, you can either request service A and B together, or service A only. What is a good way to describe this constraint succinctly in the diagram?

Tags of relevance.
Source Link
MDCCL
  • 8.5k
  • 3
  • 31
  • 62

EER ModelDiagram - subclasses which are neither disjoint nor fully overlapping

Suppose we are writing an EERenhanced entity-relationship diagram (EERD) for a company's database. This company offers two services A and B. If the two services were disjoint, then this might look something like:

enter image description here

In many cases you could request both services from the company, in which case an we would use an "o" instead of a "d".

Suppose that for this company, you can either request service A and B together, or service A only. What is a good way to describe this constraint succinctly in the diagram?

EER Model - subclasses which are neither disjoint nor fully overlapping

Suppose we are writing an EER diagram for a company's database. This company offers two services A and B. If the two services were disjoint, then this might look something like

enter image description here

In many cases you could request both services from the company, in which case an we would use an "o" instead of a "d".

Suppose that for this company, you can either request service A and B together, or service A only. What is a good way to describe this constraint succinctly in the diagram?

EER Diagram - subclasses which are neither disjoint nor fully overlapping

Suppose we are writing an enhanced entity-relationship diagram (EERD) for a company's database. This company offers two services A and B. If the two services were disjoint, then this might look something like:

enter image description here

In many cases you could request both services from the company, in which case we would use an "o" instead of a "d".

Suppose that for this company, you can either request service A and B together, or service A only. What is a good way to describe this constraint succinctly in the diagram?

deleted 4 characters in body
Source Link

Suppose we are writing an EER diagram for a company's database. This company offers two services $A$A and $B$B. If the two services were disjoint, then this might look something like

enter image description here

In many cases you could request both services from the company, in which case an we would use an "o" instead of a "d".

Suppose that for this company, you can either request service A and B together, or service A only. What is a good way to describe this constraint succinctly in the diagram?

Suppose we are writing an EER diagram for a company's database. This company offers two services $A$ and $B$. If the two services were disjoint, then this might look something like

enter image description here

In many cases you could request both services from the company, in which case an we would use an "o" instead of a "d".

Suppose that for this company, you can either request service A and B together, or service A only. What is a good way to describe this constraint succinctly in the diagram?

Suppose we are writing an EER diagram for a company's database. This company offers two services A and B. If the two services were disjoint, then this might look something like

enter image description here

In many cases you could request both services from the company, in which case an we would use an "o" instead of a "d".

Suppose that for this company, you can either request service A and B together, or service A only. What is a good way to describe this constraint succinctly in the diagram?

Source Link
Loading