Does RDBMS table stores the row data one after another in a data block  ? Once data block is full, is the new block assigned contiguous ?

Per my understanding when table is created  , DBMS vendor must be keeping the some number of contiguous blocks reserved for a table. Once that chunk of blocks is full, another set of contiguous blocks must be assigned to that table. Isn't it  ? It will help the DBMS to efficiently read the range scan.

So to me looks like answer to first question is certainly yes  . For second question it is yes till it has blocks available.

I have got some idea from oracle which is more or less similar to my understanding

Does a RDBMS store the row data one after another in a data block? Once data block is full, is the new block assigned continuous?

Per my understanding when table is created, DBMS vendor must be keeping the some number of contiguous blocks reserved for a table. Once that chunk of blocks is full, another set of contiguous blocks must be assigned to that table. Isn't it? It will help the DBMS to efficiently read the range scan.

So to me looks like answer to first question is certainly yes. For second question it is yes till it has blocks available.

I have got some idea from Oracle which is more or less similar to my understanding

Does RDBMS table stores the row data one after another in a data block ? Once data block is full, is the new block assigned contiguous ?

Per my understanding when table is created , DBMS vendor must be keeping the some number of contiguous blocks reserved for a table. Once that chunk of blocks is full, another set of contiguous blocks must be assigned to that table. Isn't it ? It will help the DBMS to efficiently read the range scan.

So to me looks like answer to first question is certainly yes . For second question it is yes till it has blocks available.

Does RDBMS table stores the row data one after another in a data block ? Once data block is full, is the new block assigned contiguous ?

Per my understanding when table is created , DBMS vendor must be keeping the some number of contiguous blocks reserved for a table. Once that chunk of blocks is full, another set of contiguous blocks must be assigned to that table. Isn't it ? It will help the DBMS to efficiently read the range scan.

So to me looks like answer to first question is certainly yes . For second question it is yes till it has blocks available.

I have got some idea from oracle which is more or less similar to my understanding