Skip to main content
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
Source Link

For simple key/value storage, you might like to consider Berkeley DB, though I would not think Git would be the best for 'version control'. You can use Ruby bindingsRuby bindings with BDB.

Since your edit, I'm left wondering If you want an open-source implementation of something like Amazon S3

For simple key/value storage, you might like to consider Berkeley DB, though I would not think Git would be the best for 'version control'. You can use Ruby bindings with BDB.

Since your edit, I'm left wondering If you want an open-source implementation of something like Amazon S3

For simple key/value storage, you might like to consider Berkeley DB, though I would not think Git would be the best for 'version control'. You can use Ruby bindings with BDB.

Since your edit, I'm left wondering If you want an open-source implementation of something like Amazon S3

added 109 characters in body
Source Link
Jack Douglas
  • 40.2k
  • 15
  • 104
  • 177

For simple key/value storage, you might like to consider Berkeley DB, though I would not think Git would be the best for 'version control'. You can use Ruby bindings with BDB.

Since your edit, I'm left wondering If you want an open-source implementation of something like Amazon S3

For simple key/value storage, you might like to consider Berkeley DB, though I would not think Git would be the best for 'version control'. You can use Ruby bindings with BDB.

For simple key/value storage, you might like to consider Berkeley DB, though I would not think Git would be the best for 'version control'. You can use Ruby bindings with BDB.

Since your edit, I'm left wondering If you want an open-source implementation of something like Amazon S3

Source Link
Jack Douglas
  • 40.2k
  • 15
  • 104
  • 177

For simple key/value storage, you might like to consider Berkeley DB, though I would not think Git would be the best for 'version control'. You can use Ruby bindings with BDB.