Timeline for How to manage 3.1 billion rows of data?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2013 at 18:03 | vote | accept | Calgary Coder | ||
| Jan 4, 2013 at 1:06 | answer | added | avakharia | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jan 3, 2013 at 4:03 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackDBAs/status/286684075266289666 | ||
| Jan 2, 2013 at 21:51 | comment | added | Jon Seigel | There are advantages and disadvantages to each solution. It's also possible to use both at the same time. | |
| Jan 2, 2013 at 19:48 | comment | added | Calgary Coder | @Jon - Yes, I have considered manual table partitions (that particular choice will be based on whether or not there is an Enterprise license available... if yes, why role my own). | |
| Jan 2, 2013 at 19:43 | comment | added | Jon Seigel | On Standard Edition, you can still partition the data using partitioned views and multiple base tables. Not sure if you considered that. | |
| Jan 2, 2013 at 19:29 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 2, 2013 at 19:35 | |||||
| Jan 2, 2013 at 19:24 | comment | added | Taryn | No problem, I was just making sure we didn't have question cross-posted. | |
| Jan 2, 2013 at 19:23 | comment | added | Calgary Coder | @bluefeet - Yes, it was flagged as off-topic... so I deleted the SO question and re-created here (I should probably have waited for it to be migrated). | |
| Jan 2, 2013 at 19:20 | comment | added | Taryn | Did you delete the version of this question on StackOverflow? | |
| Jan 2, 2013 at 19:12 | history | asked | Calgary Coder | CC BY-SA 3.0 |