Timeline for SQL Server 2000 performance
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 14, 2013 at 15:01 | answer | added | HLGEM | timeline score: 0 | |
Jan 10, 2013 at 14:37 | comment | added | Marian | @MartinSmith: you're right, that was also my first thought :-). 2 GB of RAM and CPU at 50%? Is it a dual processor and you've disabled parallelism by any chance? How do you check the RAM usage? If it's by using Task Manager, it's not reliable at all. Let's go from this info and we'll go on further. So: what version of OS, what version of SQL Server, how many CPUs, how much RAM do you have? | |
Jan 10, 2013 at 13:20 | comment | added | Martin Smith | BTW: You don't tell us anything about the server. If it is 32 bit then the RAM as shown in taskmgr won't go above 2GB except if you are using the 3GB switch. Also how big is the database in GB and what is the page life expectancy on the server? | |
Jan 9, 2013 at 22:49 | history | edited | Jon Seigel |
edited tags
|
|
Jan 9, 2013 at 21:28 | comment | added | Martin Smith | Sounds like you are probably missing some useful indexes. | |
Jan 9, 2013 at 21:22 | history | migrated | from stackoverflow.com (revisions) | ||
Jan 9, 2013 at 16:19 | comment | added | user1922240 | We are using some old software that integrates with SQL server 2000 and i'm not sure of the possible problems with upgrading as the company who developed the software is no longer in business. And the GUID is not used for the PK. | |
Jan 9, 2013 at 16:13 | comment | added | Zane | Are the GUID's used for the Primary key and if so are they set up for NewsequentialID? Also Agree with the above you guys might want to think about upgrading to a version that is less than 10 years old. | |
Jan 9, 2013 at 16:10 | answer | added | Danielle Paquette-Harvey | timeline score: 0 | |
Jan 9, 2013 at 16:07 | answer | added | Eugene Roeder | timeline score: 1 | |
Jan 9, 2013 at 16:03 | history | asked | user1922240 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |