Timeline for Is a REINDEX required after CLUSTER?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2015 at 12:13 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackDBAs/status/663328524237975552 | ||
| Sep 18, 2015 at 14:25 | answer | added | Aislan Luiz Wendling | timeline score: -3 | |
| Jan 27, 2014 at 22:00 | vote | accept | TREE | ||
| Apr 15, 2013 at 11:58 | answer | added | TREE | timeline score: 7 | |
| Apr 10, 2013 at 23:35 | answer | added | Craig Ringer | timeline score: 17 | |
| Apr 10, 2013 at 20:56 | answer | added | András Váczi | timeline score: 8 | |
| Apr 10, 2013 at 15:31 | comment | added | TREE | Yes, but the theory in half the discussions I've found is that that causes the index to bloat. | |
| Apr 10, 2013 at 15:12 | comment | added | user1822 |
I don't think it's necessary. cluster relocates the rows, so it will have to update the index information anyhow.
|
|
| Apr 10, 2013 at 15:07 | review | First posts | |||
| Apr 10, 2013 at 15:08 | |||||
| Apr 10, 2013 at 14:50 | history | asked | TREE | CC BY-SA 3.0 |