Skip to main content
17 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 17, 2020 at 1:25 vote accept bignose
May 29, 2015 at 16:04 history edited Hannah Vernon
edited tags
Sep 24, 2011 at 12:50 comment added bignose Good questions, thank you for making me think about my requirements. I'm exploring further at stackoverflow.com/questions/7539122/…
Sep 24, 2011 at 12:29 history edited bignose CC BY-SA 3.0
correct an example
Sep 24, 2011 at 10:54 comment added Jack Douglas Also, do you want A=B to imply B=A as I've assumed in my edit?
Sep 24, 2011 at 10:49 comment added Jack Douglas My point is that you are stretching the definition of equality so that A=C and B=C no longer implies A=B. As long as that is what you want... see my updated answer
Sep 24, 2011 at 10:42 history edited bignose CC BY-SA 3.0
more implications of ISO 8601
Sep 24, 2011 at 10:41 comment added bignose Not “might be”; the values are deliberately reduced-precision. The meaning of 1964-05 in ISO 8601 includes the more-precise values 1964-05-02 and 1964-05-02 18:27 and 1964-05-23. So those should all compare equal.
Sep 24, 2011 at 10:25 comment added Jack Douglas In other words you want the equality operator to give true when the timestamps 'might' be equal (allowing for precision)?
Sep 24, 2011 at 10:13 history edited bignose CC BY-SA 3.0
more detail about expected behaviour
Sep 23, 2011 at 22:36 history edited bignose CC BY-SA 3.0
highlight
Sep 23, 2011 at 10:01 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackDBAs/status/117176848303128576
Sep 23, 2011 at 8:06 history edited bignose CC BY-SA 3.0
respond to suggestions for using different type
Sep 22, 2011 at 14:15 answer added Mike Sherrill 'Cat Recall' timeline score: 6
Sep 22, 2011 at 12:49 answer added Jack Douglas timeline score: 5
Sep 22, 2011 at 1:24 history edited bignose CC BY-SA 3.0
fix pasted session
Sep 22, 2011 at 1:01 history asked bignose CC BY-SA 3.0