Timeline for Is bulk-logged recovery model ever a good choice if point-in-time restore is not needed?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2014 at 18:55 | vote | accept | SomeGuy | ||
| Mar 12, 2014 at 15:46 | history | edited | SomeGuy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Mar 12, 2014 at 13:43 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackDBAs/status/443744102388338689 | ||
| Mar 12, 2014 at 13:26 | answer | added | Thomas Stringer | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 12, 2014 at 13:25 | answer | added | gbn | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 12, 2014 at 13:25 | answer | added | Jens D. | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 12, 2014 at 13:23 | comment | added | Jon Seigel |
BULK_LOGGED is more like FULL than it is like SIMPLE. For your scenario it sounds like SIMPLE is fine.
|
|
| Mar 12, 2014 at 13:17 | history | asked | SomeGuy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |