Timeline for Is DB2 more reliable and stable compared to PostgreSQL or MySQL?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2012 at 8:23 | answer | added | Chris Travers | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 18, 2011 at 23:21 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackDBAs/status/137671896144691201 | ||
| Nov 17, 2011 at 20:42 | vote | accept | YumYumYum | ||
| Nov 17, 2011 at 20:13 | comment | added | Frank Heikens | PostgreSQL is well known for it's reliability. If you lost some data, it's unlikely it's PostgreSQL fault. PostgreSQL and DB2 are on parr when it comes to reliability. | |
| Nov 12, 2011 at 14:28 | history | edited | Mark Storey-Smith | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Nov 12, 2011 at 11:29 | comment | added | Jack Douglas | Don't forget vendor support when you are considering HA - who do you trust to help you out 24/7 when the chips are down, and how much can you afford to pay for that comfort. | |
| Nov 12, 2011 at 11:15 | answer | added | Mark Storey-Smith | timeline score: 15 | |
| Nov 12, 2011 at 10:04 | history | asked | YumYumYum | CC BY-SA 3.0 |