Timeline for In SQL Server 2008, is possible to one database subscribe 2 publications for the same database? (merge replication)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2011 at 10:39 | vote | accept | RagnaRock | ||
| Dec 7, 2011 at 10:38 | vote | accept | RagnaRock | ||
| Dec 7, 2011 at 10:39 | |||||
| Dec 7, 2011 at 10:36 | history | edited | RagnaRock | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 characters in body
|
| Dec 7, 2011 at 10:35 | vote | accept | RagnaRock | ||
| Dec 7, 2011 at 10:35 | |||||
| Dec 7, 2011 at 10:34 | answer | added | RagnaRock | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 15, 2011 at 19:31 | comment | added | gbn | That link is an edge case and doesn't match what you want. Don't pick one article that agrees with what you want: it differs from all the answers and advice given on this site. | |
| Nov 14, 2011 at 20:41 | answer | added | datagod | timeline score: 4 | |
| Nov 14, 2011 at 18:32 | comment | added | RagnaRock | this is replication, but replication can be used to achieve HA, as stated here. At this point I'm just testing this technology, with 3 SQL instances with just one table for testing purposes. If it goes well I plan to replicate the whole DB. I want to know if its possible to have a circular chain of merge replication between the 3 DB's. If it is...I'm not being able to do it, but I'm not having any explicit error, it's just not working | |
| Nov 14, 2011 at 17:18 | comment | added | jcolebrand♦ | @RagnaRock I feel like this is about the fourth time people have complained about your communication on this site. Is this something that we can help you resolve? If you do want help, please visit chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/179/the-heap and we can see what's going on. | |
| Nov 14, 2011 at 17:15 | comment | added | gbn | no, it isn't HA. It is replication. Do you publish the whole database? | |
| Nov 14, 2011 at 17:13 | comment | added | RagnaRock | is this case of replication it also works as high availability, because if one server fails, the other ones are available to do the exact same work. I just want to know if this is possible, or if theres is any limitation (like one table only can subscribe one subscription) | |
| Nov 14, 2011 at 16:51 | comment | added | gbn | Replication is not "high availability" as mentioned in answers to your previous question dba.stackexchange.com/questions/7690/…. And now you ask for help on the wrong solution? | |
| Nov 14, 2011 at 16:42 | history | asked | RagnaRock | CC BY-SA 3.0 |