Timeline for Alternative for taking the backup of SQL DB's on backup drive
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2014 at 15:40 | comment | added | KASQLDBA | No problem, we are in talks with symantec guys, its just they think we being SQL DBA's can use the scripts even made on their environment. Something new, but lets see, thanks for your'e time. | |
| Dec 11, 2014 at 15:31 | comment | added | RLF | I do not know how. It has probably been 15 years since I last used Symantec tools. | |
| Dec 11, 2014 at 15:27 | comment | added | KASQLDBA | Hello RFL, just got an update from windows team, they are saying there were issues with NBU, however they agreed to continuing with that. But for now, they want us to utilize the process of NBU on symantec net backup, to write batch scripts which can take directly backups on using the process. Do you by chance have any idea on ow that batch script works? | |
| Dec 11, 2014 at 14:05 | comment | added | KASQLDBA | RLF, for point 1>> Yes we are no longer using NBU. For point 2>> Windows team are planning to use DPM as part of backing up as dedicated file servers. Therefore for point 2 to act, as per them we need to have SQL DB Backups to be a part of plan and needs to be taken. Actually the concern is first we are too much short of space , almost 95% disk full and moreover we have the server version as SQL2k5 where quite a number of DB residing. | |
| Dec 11, 2014 at 13:42 | history | edited | RLF | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
grammar
|
| Dec 11, 2014 at 13:29 | history | answered | RLF | CC BY-SA 3.0 |