Timeline for RAID10 vs. RAID5 for data files
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2022 at 17:58 | comment | added | variable | Is this assuming that a set of physical disks are dedicated to the respectice drives on sql server? Or all drives on sql server shares the same physical disks? | |
| Mar 27, 2015 at 16:34 | vote | accept | Zero Subnet | ||
| Mar 25, 2015 at 22:57 | comment | added | Rob Farley | Yup, I agree with what you write, Mark. | |
| Mar 25, 2015 at 22:50 | comment | added | Mark | The maths of RAID 5 degraded operation are easy: it's just a bunch of XORs, which a modern CPU should be able to do at a rate of GB/s. The slowdown during degraded operation comes from accumulating the data: in order to reconstruct what was on the failed disk, you need to read from every other disk in the array. | |
| Mar 25, 2015 at 20:58 | history | answered | Rob Farley | CC BY-SA 3.0 |