I'm trying to get to the bottom of what I'm thinking is a performance issue when creating in memory temporary tables. The underlying query I have looks to me to be pretty well optimized. The explain is below the query. The temporary table it builds has ~4Million rows. The query (with no cache specified) runs in 150 ms, the creation of the table takes 15 seconds. Couple other interesting things I'm seeing. I'd thought maybe I needed a covering index for the underlying query that builds the table but don't think that's really possible when I'm selecting from two tables that are joined so I replaced the query with a simpler version, just selecting the StoreID. Run time was the same ... ~15 seconds to build the temp table. After the table was created I did a "create table like " and then did the index build. It took about 2 seconds which also doesn't make sense to me. Anyone got any thoughts?
CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE IF NOT EXISTS TTTe5f0f36ca5fec1d49a75d5cb5d88233f
(repID INT,StoreID INT,EntityID INT , INDEX st (`StoreID`) ) engine=memory
AS
SELECT ass_.AssociatedObjectID AS repID, ass_.OwnerUsergroupID AS EntityID,
ent_.MVStoreID AS StoreID, 1 as assignmentCount
FROM MVAssignment AS ass_
JOIN TTTf122b1fd3249346930db2dff0c43b022 existsTT
ON existsTT.ID = ass_.AssociatedObjectID
JOIN MVList_Stores as list_stores
ON ass_.AssignmentValue = list_stores.MVListID
JOIN MVMasterEntity_AttachedStores ent_
ON ent_.MVStoreID = list_stores.MVStoreID
WHERE ass_.AssociatedObjectClass = 'MVRep'
AND ass_.AssignmentSubType = 'ListID'
AND ass_.IsDeleted = 0
AND EXISTS
(
SELECT StoreID
from TTT08d81ab1ab02c079ffebae286c342e62 existsTT
where ent_.MVStoreID=existsTT.StoreID
) ;
/* queryTime - 15.1777 seconds */
The explain is as follows
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
1 PRIMARY existsTT ALL ID 20024 Using where
1 PRIMARY ass_ ref assignmentQuery,joshTest,testTwo,joshTest3,anodaTEst,uniqueness,uutt,AssignmentValue,AssociatedObjectID,AssociatedObject testTwo 4 benchmark.existsTT.ID 1 Using index condition
1 PRIMARY list_stores ref StoreList,MVListID,MVStoreID MVListID 4 benchmark.ass_.AssignmentValue 1 Using index condition
1 PRIMARY ent_ ref MVStoreID MVStoreID 4 benchmark.list_stores.MVStoreID 1 Using where; Using index
2 DEPENDENT SUBQUERY existsTT ref st st 5 benchmark.ent_.MVStoreID 2
Here is the json explain
{
"query_block": {
"select_id": 1,
"nested_loop": [
{
"table": {
"table_name": "existsTT",
"access_type": "ALL",
"possible_keys": [
"ID"
],
"rows": 20024,
"filtered": 100,
"attached_condition": "(\"benchmark\".\"existsTT\".\"ID\" is not null)"
}
},
{
"table": {
"table_name": "ass_",
"access_type": "ref",
"possible_keys": [
"assignmentQuery",
"joshTest",
"testTwo",
"joshTest3",
"anodaTEst",
"uniqueness",
"uutt",
"AssignmentValue",
"AssociatedObjectID",
"AssociatedObject"
],
"key": "testTwo",
"used_key_parts": [
"AssociatedObjectID"
],
"key_length": "4",
"ref": [
"benchmark.existsTT.ID"
],
"rows": 1,
"filtered": 100,
"index_condition": "(((\"benchmark\".\"ass_\".\"IsDeleted\" = 0) and (\"benchmark\".\"ass_\".\"AssociatedObjectClass\" = 'MVRep') and (\"benchmark\".\"ass_\".\"AssignmentSubType\" = 'ListID')) and (\"benchmark\".\"ass_\".\"AssignmentValue\" is not
}
},
{
"table": {
"table_name": "list_stores",
"access_type": "ref",
"possible_keys": [
"StoreList",
"MVListID",
"MVStoreID"
],
"key": "MVListID",
"used_key_parts": [
"MVListID"
],
"key_length": "4",
"ref": [
"benchmark.ass_.AssignmentValue"
],
"rows": 1,
"filtered": 100,
"index_condition": "(\"benchmark\".\"ass_\".\"AssignmentValue\" = \"benchmark\".\"list_stores\".\"MVListID\")"
}
},
{
"table": {
"table_name": "ent_",
"access_type": "ref",
"possible_keys": [
"MVStoreID"
],
"key": "MVStoreID",
"used_key_parts": [
"MVStoreID"
],
"key_length": "4",
"ref": [
"benchmark.list_stores.MVStoreID"
],
"rows": 1,
"filtered": 100,
"using_index": true,
"attached_condition": "exists(/* select#2 */ select \"benchmark\".\"existsTT\".\"StoreID\" from \"benchmark\".\"TTT08d81ab1ab02c079ffebae286c342e62\" \"existsTT\" where (\"benchmark\".\"ent_\".\"MVStoreID\" = \"benchmark\".\"existsTT\".\"StoreID\"
"attached_subqueries": [
{
"dependent": true,
"cacheable": false,
"query_block": {
"select_id": 2,
"table": {
"table_name": "existsTT",
"access_type": "ref",
"possible_keys": [
"st"
],
"key": "st",
"used_key_parts": [
"StoreID"
],
"key_length": "5",
"ref": [
"benchmark.ent_.MVStoreID"
],
"rows": 2,
"filtered": 100
}
}
}
]
}
}
]
}
}
show create table syntax for all involved tables:
CREATE TABLE "MVAssignment" (
"ID" int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
"ClassName" enum('MVAssignment') DEFAULT 'MVAssignment',
"Created" datetime DEFAULT NULL,
"LastEdited" datetime DEFAULT NULL,
"AssignmentType" enum('MVCustomField','MVBrand','MVStore','MVList','MVRetailer','MVBillingCode','MVRep','MVTagName','MVSkillAndCapability') DEFAULT 'MVCustomField',
"AssignmentSubType" enum('SkillsAndCapabilities','SkillAndCapabilityID','allSkillsAndCapabilities','BrandID','Brands','allBrands','CustomFields','CustomFieldNameID','CustomFieldValue','allCustomFields','BillingCodes','BillingCodeID','allBillingCodes','Lists','ListID','allLists','RepID','allReps','Reps','RepsLetterRange','Stores','StoresLetterRange','StoresState','StoresZip','StoreZip','StoresCity','StoreID','allStores','StoreZips','StoreZipsRange','allStoreZips','StoresByNumber','StoreNumberID','allStoresByNumber','Retailers','RetailersLetterRange','RetailerID','allRetailers','Tags','TagNameID','TagValue','allTags') DEFAULT 'SkillsAndCapabilities',
"AssignmentValue" varchar(255) DEFAULT NULL,
"AssociatedObjectClass" enum('MVmPlan','MVRep','MVSalesToolBucket','MVUsergroup','MVAlert','MVItemLevelOverride') DEFAULT 'MVmPlan',
"AssociatedObjectID" int(11) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
"IsDeleted" tinyint(1) unsigned NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
"OwnerObjectClass" enum('MVEntityUser') DEFAULT 'MVEntityUser',
"OwnerObjectID" int(11) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
"OwnerUsergroupID" int(11) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
"UniquenessHash" varchar(32) DEFAULT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY ("ID"),
KEY "OwnerObject" ("OwnerObjectClass","OwnerObjectID"),
KEY "assignmentQuery" ("AssignmentValue","AssociatedObjectClass","IsDeleted","AssignmentSubType"),
KEY "joshTest" ("AssignmentValue","AssociatedObjectID","AssociatedObjectClass","AssignmentSubType","IsDeleted"),
KEY "testTwo" ("AssociatedObjectID","AssignmentValue","AssignmentSubType","AssociatedObjectClass","IsDeleted"),
KEY "joshTest3" ("AssignmentValue","AssociatedObjectID","AssociatedObjectClass","AssignmentSubType","IsDeleted","OwnerObjectID"),
KEY "anodaTEst" ("AssociatedObjectID","AssociatedObjectClass","AssignmentSubType","IsDeleted","AssignmentValue"),
KEY "uniqueness" ("IsDeleted","AssociatedObjectClass","AssignmentType","AssociatedObjectID","UniquenessHash"),
KEY "uutt" ("AssociatedObjectID","AssignmentValue","AssignmentSubType","AssociatedObjectClass","IsDeleted","UniquenessHash"),
KEY "AssignmentValue" ("AssignmentValue"),
KEY "AssociatedObjectID" ("AssociatedObjectID"),
KEY "OwnerObjectID" ("OwnerObjectID"),
KEY "AssociatedObject" ("AssociatedObjectClass","AssociatedObjectID"),
KEY "ClassName" ("ClassName"),
KEY "rickJames" ("AssociatedObjectClass","AssignmentSubType","IsDeleted")
)
CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE "TTT97a84e6f7eaa4bf3b2fbb8491517324c" (
"ID" int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
KEY "ID" ("ID")
)
CREATE TABLE "MVList_Stores" (
"ID" int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
"MVListID" int(11) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
"MVStoreID" int(11) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
PRIMARY KEY ("ID"),
KEY "StoreList" ("MVStoreID","MVListID"),
KEY "MVListID" ("MVListID"),
KEY "MVStoreID" ("MVStoreID")
)
CREATE TABLE "MVMasterEntity_AttachedStores" (
"ID" int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
"MVMasterEntityID" int(11) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
"MVStoreID" int(11) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
PRIMARY KEY ("ID"),
KEY "MVMasterEntityID" ("MVMasterEntityID"),
KEY "MVStoreID" ("MVStoreID")
)
The slow query log for the create table syntax is the following
2018-06-21 13:32:25 benchmark[benchmark] @ [10.0.0.214] 00:00:15 00:00:00 0 8048999 benchmark 0 0 1548456745
/* queryTime - 0.8239 seconds */
↵↵CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE IF NOT EXISTS TTT4611cfe97d6fc08d6242f403e3317551 (repID INT,StoreID INT,EntityID INT , INDEX st (`StoreID`) ) engine=memory AS
SELECT ass_.AssociatedObjectID AS repID, ass_.OwnerUsergroupID AS EntityID, ent_.MVStoreID AS StoreID/*, count(ass_.AssociatedObjectID) as assignmentCount*/ , 1 as assignmentCount FROM MVAssignment AS ass_ JOIN TTT97a84e6f7eaa4bf3b2fbb8491517324c existsTT on existsTT.ID = ass_.AssociatedObjectID JOIN MVList_Stores as list_stores ON ass_.AssignmentValue = list_stores.MVListID JOIN MVMasterEntity_AttachedStores ent_
ON ent_.MVStoreID = list_stores.MVStoreID
WHERE ass_.AssociatedObjectClass = 'MVRep'
AND ass_.AssignmentSubType = 'ListID'
AND ass_.IsDeleted = 0
/* GROUP BY ass_.AssociatedObjectID, ent_.MVStoreID*/ 42994
I've rearranged the query a little bit simplified it a bit for testing (takes 7 seconds but only one column is selected / created on the temp table)...
SELECT mvas.MVStoreID AS StoreID
FROM MVAssignment AS ass_
JOIN MVList_Stores AS list_stores ON ass_.AssignmentValue = list_stores.MVListID
JOIN MVMasterEntity_AttachedStores mvas ON mvas.MVStoreID = list_stores.MVStoreID
WHERE EXISTS (
SELECT ID
FROM TTT97a84e6f7eaa4bf3b2fbb8491517324c existsTT
WHERE existsTT.ID = ass_.AssociatedObjectID
)
AND ass_.AssociatedObjectClass = 'MVRep'
AND ass_.AssignmentSubType = 'ListID'
AND ass_.IsDeleted = 0 ;
slightly different explain
1 PRIMARY ass_ ref assignmentQuery,joshTest,joshTest3,uniqueness,AssignmentValue,AssociatedObject,rickJames uniqueness 2 const,const 27457 Using index condition; Using where
1 PRIMARY list_stores ref StoreList,MVListID,MVStoreID MVListID 4 benchmark.ass_.AssignmentValue 114 Using index condition
1 PRIMARY mvas ref MVStoreID MVStoreID 4 benchmark.list_stores.MVStoreID 1 Using index
2 DEPENDENT SUBQUERY existsTT eq_ref PRIMARY PRIMARY 4 benchmark.ass_.AssociatedObjectID 1 NULL
So, I would normally be thinking , well this is as fast as I can get it ... but if I do a super simple query like this...
CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE IF NOT EXISTS TTT4611rcfe97ed6fc08d6242f403e3d3r1r74d5dd51 (
StoreID INT NOT NULL
) engine=memory AS
SELECT MVStoreID FROM MVMasterEntity_AttachedStores ent_;
which puts 4 million rows in a temp table in < 1 sec ... it makes me think there is some way I can arrange my query so that it builds the temp table in a similar time that it takes to run the underlying query. Should I give it up ?
INDEX(a)
andINDEX(a,b)
, drop of the former. Drop joshTest and AssociatedObjectID and AssignmentValue. (This won't solve the problem; it's just a cleanup.)