I'm having a problem with a 2-node active-active cluster which has been failing over lately but not bringing resources back online.
We've had a Microsoft engineer look at it and, among other things, he noted that it was unusual to have a Quorum disk group explicitly created under the Services and Applications node and thought that this might cause a problem.
I'm a bit puzzled as to whether this is a factor or not. Certainly most of the documentation on quorum disk configurations don't create a specific cluster group to contain the Quorum disk - just going through the Quorum Disk Configuration Wizard seems to be all that is required.
I had always thought of a Quorum disk as being a 'fixed point' - i.e. it doesn't belong to a cluster group and doesn't fail over when a node fails over as to do so might mean the cluster no longer being in quorum (quorate?). However other documents I've read do suggest that the Quorum disk does 'belong' to a node. However if you have an active-active configuration which one gets to own it?