Since objects in pg_catalog schema are implicitly in the search_path (docs), would it be recommended to install extensions in that schema?

2 Answers 2


Don't install extensions to pg_catalog (unless that's their default: very few extensions are designed that way), because you don't mess with system catalog, ever. @Chris demonstrates one reason why. There are others.

However, the "public" schema is in no way special. It's just the default schema that's pre-installed in standard distributions so we can get started right away. Some DB admins don't use the "public" schema at all, some even delete it.

CREATE EXTENSION is not affiliated to the "public" schema. It installs into the current schema unless instructed otherwise - except some extensions have a pre-set schema (like PGQ / Londiste). The documentation:


The name of the schema in which to install the extension's objects, given that the extension allows its contents to be relocated. The named schema must already exist. If not specified, and the extension's control file does not specify a schema either, the current default object creation schema is used.

Remember that the extension itself is not considered to be within any schema: extensions have unqualified names that must be unique database-wide. But objects belonging to the extension can be within schemas.

Bold emphasis mine.
Decide how to manage users, schemas and the search_path:

Then decide where to install extensions. You can install to any schema of your choice and include that schema in the default search_path for all users or just for some or no users at all (so that qualified references are required). It all depends on what you want to achieve.
Whatever you do, stay consistent.

I like to install extensions (that allow it) in a dedicated "extensions" schema, which I include in the default search_path after "public" (and "$user" - if you use that). Helps with a clean separation of my own public functions and other public objects. My setting in postgresql.conf:

search_path = "$user",public,extensions


search_path = public,extensions

And I install extensions with:

CREATE EXTENSION some_extension SCHEMA extensions;

One thing to note: This way you can "hide" (unqualified) objects in the extensions schema behind objects of the same name (and parameters) in the public schema.


  • ok is plpgsql extension then somehow an exception to this rule? Every install I have seen has this extension in pg_catalog
    – zam6ak
    Jul 20, 2015 at 13:18
  • @zam6ak: Yes, plpgsql is a bit of a special case: Quoting the manual: In PostgreSQL 9.0 and later, PL/pgSQL is installed by default. However it is still a loadable module, so especially security-conscious administrators could choose to remove it. Jul 20, 2015 at 13:40
  • 1
    plv8 installs itself to pg_catalog, too. (It throws an error if you try to change it.) Is this maybe a standard for installing procedural language extensions for functions?
    – jpmc26
    Jun 23, 2016 at 17:07

Installing extensions into pg_catalog are, as far as I'm aware, not advised. You should use the default public schema, which is also in the search_path by default.


As an example, I will work with the pageinspect extension which I've already created within the public schema. All functions are, by default, accessible to all schemas in the database if they are located in the public schema.

Now, I try moving it to the pg_catalog schema, using

ALTER EXTENSION pageinspect SET SCHEMA pg_catalog;

and it works just fine.


Try to move it again, back to the public schema using

ALTER EXTENSION pageinspect SET SCHEMA public;

and it won't permit it, yielding the following error

ERROR: cannot remove dependency on schema pg_catalog because it is a system object
SQL state: 0A000

Uh oh! Well, that's OK that it won't let me move it. I can just get it back into the public schema by dropping it and re-creating, right?...

DROP EXTENSION pageinspect;

OK, good. Back in it's right place in the public schema, and the functions are still accessible to all schemas in the database.

TL,DR; Just use the default public schema for extensions.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.