38

I have some auto-generated T-SQL, which is probably valid, but I don't really understand.

ALTER TABLE [dbo].[MyTable]
WITH CHECK
CHECK CONSTRAINT [My_FORIEGN_KEY];

I know what a foreign key constraint is, but what's the CHECK CHECK?

2
  • 7
    How much "WITH" could a "WITH CHECK CHECK"...? Oct 27, 2020 at 15:08
  • 4
    @Dodecaphone That depends on how many CHECKS a WITH could CHECK, if a WITH could CHECK CHECKS.
    – Dai
    May 19, 2021 at 0:09

2 Answers 2

48

The MSDN documentattion page about ALTER TABLE explains these:

  • ALTER TABLE: modify the table's structure
    (and some of the possible actions/modifications are):
    • CHECK CONSTRAINT ..: enable the constraint
    • NOCHECK CONSTRAINT ..: disable the constraint
      There are also additional, optional steps to do while creating/enabling/disabling a constraint:
      • WITH CHECK: check the constraint as well
      • WITH NOCHECK: do not check the constraint

In their words:

| [ WITH { CHECK | NOCHECK } ] { CHECK | NOCHECK } CONSTRAINT   
    { ALL | constraint_name [ ,...n ] }

...

WITH CHECK | WITH NOCHECK Specifies whether the data in the table is or is not validated against a newly added or re-enabled FOREIGN KEY or CHECK constraint. If not specified, WITH CHECK is assumed for new constraints, and WITH NOCHECK is assumed for re-enabled constraints.

If you do not want to verify new CHECK or FOREIGN KEY constraints against existing data, use WITH NOCHECK. We do not recommend doing this, except in rare cases. The new constraint will be evaluated in all later data updates. Any constraint violations that are suppressed by WITH NOCHECK when the constraint is added may cause future updates to fail if they update rows with data that does not comply with the constraint.

The query optimizer does not consider constraints that are defined WITH NOCHECK. Such constraints are ignored until they are re-enabled by using ALTER TABLE table WITH CHECK CHECK CONSTRAINT ALL.

...

{ CHECK | NOCHECK } CONSTRAINT
Specifies that constraint_name is enabled or disabled. This option can only be used with FOREIGN KEY and CHECK constraints. When NOCHECK is specified, the constraint is disabled and future inserts or updates to the column are not validated against the constraint conditions. DEFAULT, PRIMARY KEY, and UNIQUE constraints cannot be disabled.

Test in dbfiddle:

CREATE TABLE a (aid INT PRIMARY KEY);

GO

INSERT INTO a (aid)
VALUES (1), (2), (3) ;

GO

3 rows affected
CREATE TABLE b 
( aid INT,
  bid INT PRIMARY KEY,
  CONSTRAINT [My_FORIEGN_KEY]
    FOREIGN KEY (aid) REFERENCES a (aid)
) ;

GO

INSERT INTO b (aid, bid)
VALUES
  (1, 11),
  (1, 12),
  (2, 21), 
  (3, 31) ;

GO

4 rows affected
INSERT INTO b (aid, bid)
VALUES
  (6, 61),
  (6, 62) ;

GO

Msg 547 Level 16 State 0 Line 1
The INSERT statement conflicted with the FOREIGN KEY constraint "My_FORIEGN_KEY". The conflict occurred in database "fiddle_792fce5de09f42908c3a0f91421f3522", table "dbo.a", column 'aid'.
Msg 3621 Level 0 State 0 Line 1
The statement has been terminated.
SELECT * FROM b ;

GO

aid | bid
--: | --:
  1 |  11
  1 |  12
  2 |  21
  3 |  31
ALTER TABLE b NOCHECK CONSTRAINT [My_FORIEGN_KEY];   --disable

GO

INSERT INTO b (aid, bid)
VALUES
  (4, 41),
  (4, 42) ;

GO

2 rows affected
SELECT * FROM b ;

GO

aid | bid
--: | --:
  1 |  11
  1 |  12
  2 |  21
  3 |  31
  4 |  41
  4 |  42
ALTER TABLE b WITH NOCHECK CHECK CONSTRAINT [My_FORIEGN_KEY];  
-- enable constraint without checking existing data

GO

SELECT * FROM b ;

GO

aid | bid
--: | --:
  1 |  11
  1 |  12
  2 |  21
  3 |  31
  4 |  41
  4 |  42
INSERT INTO b (aid, bid)
VALUES
  (6, 61),
  (6, 62) ;

GO

Msg 547 Level 16 State 0 Line 1
The INSERT statement conflicted with the FOREIGN KEY constraint "My_FORIEGN_KEY". The conflict occurred in database "fiddle_792fce5de09f42908c3a0f91421f3522", table "dbo.a", column 'aid'.
Msg 3621 Level 0 State 0 Line 1
The statement has been terminated.
SELECT * FROM b ;

GO

aid | bid
--: | --:
  1 |  11
  1 |  12
  2 |  21
  3 |  31
  4 |  41
  4 |  42
ALTER TABLE b WITH CHECK CHECK CONSTRAINT [My_FORIEGN_KEY];  
-- check existing data and enable constraint 

GO

Msg 547 Level 16 State 0 Line 1
The ALTER TABLE statement conflicted with the FOREIGN KEY constraint "My_FORIEGN_KEY". The conflict occurred in database "fiddle_792fce5de09f42908c3a0f91421f3522", table "dbo.a", column 'aid'.
3
  • 1
    Thanks. W.r.t ALTER TABLE b WITH NOCHECK CHECK CONSTRAINT [My_FORIEGN_KEY]; -- enable constraint without checking, will this mean that the constraint won't check existing data, only new incoming data?
    – BanksySan
    Mar 22, 2017 at 13:09
  • 1
    Exactly. See how the next insert (aid=6) is not allowed but existing rows (with aid=4) are still there. Mar 22, 2017 at 13:10
  • That demonstrates it perfectly.
    – BanksySan
    Mar 22, 2017 at 13:12
1

Consider reading the article here: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms190273.aspx

It tells us:

The query optimizer does not consider constraints that are defined WITH NOCHECK. Such constraints are ignored until they are re-enabled by using ALTER TABLE table WITH CHECK CHECK CONSTRAINT ALL

Also, consider this thread on StackOverflow: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/529941/with-check-add-constraint-followed-by-check-constraint-vs-add-constraint

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.