Does anyone have any links to performance benchmarking of the database engine, or any anecdotal reports of the performance improvements in SQL Server 2012. We are only using the DB engine,not reporting services or BI. Any advice / gotchas from an upgrade point of view?

  • 2
    I don't know if there's much (or at least much recorded) on the performance benefits of upgrading to SQL Server 2012, but there's a whole list of features. If there is known perf advantages with SQL Server 2012 then @AaronBertrand would probably know. – Thomas Stringer Jun 13 '12 at 13:40
  • This article describes a comparison of 2005 against 2008, running the same code on the same hardware in both cases. In summary the difference was minimal. databasejournal.com/features/mssql/article.php/3792476/… It doesn't look as if anyone has repeated the experiment for 2008 vs 2012... – user20943 Mar 6 '13 at 16:36

There are some underlying performance enhancements in filestream and full-text search. I don't have the details handy. I am also sure there are other underlying enhancements that aren't publicized, as well as fixes from 2008/R2 that made it into service packs and cumulative updates on those platforms that were ported forward into SQL Server 2012. That would be a bit more quiet because while 2012 was in development there wasn't a need for a public KB article for every change.

Some of the new windowing functionality will make calculations like running totals perform way better. And OFFSET can be used to make child's play out of things like calculating a median. FORCESEEK also allows you to now actually specify the index you want used, instead of taking whatever SQL Server thought you meant. But those require code changes.

There is also going to be more predictable performance with regard to memory use - the memory manager now handles more than just single-page allocations, so "Max server memory" has a much more accurate meaning than it has in prior versions. Resource Governor memory settings also take advantage of this, and can be used for scheduler/NUMA affinity as well.

Troubleshooting performance is also a lot easier. For example there is a lot more information included in execution plans, and extended events has almost full parity with trace (and adds much more powerful causality tracking).

I was surprised that they didn't publish TPC stuff well in advance of the release date (not that those tests really represent real-world stuff, but it's fun to watch the "my dad can beat up your dad, at least today" arguments unfold between the vendors). Glenn Berry blogged about one of the SQL Server 2012 TPC-E results. I apologize but I don't have time to investigate whether there is an easy way to compare this apples to apples against similar benchmarks using 2008 or 2008 R2. The problem with aged benchmarks is that they're never on the same hardware, so while the new benchmarks are always faster (or else they won't get released), it's impossible to tell how much of the improvement was based on the hardware and how much on the software.

Your best bet is to install SQL Server 2012, restore a copy of your database, update compat level, update statistics, and run your worklaod on your hardware using your data.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.