0

I am running MariaDB 10.2.13 on Linux (Debian).

I am setting up an InnoDB table that will record a lot of data but I will keep only the last one-hour rows. Thus, the number of rows will remain constant.

I should expect on this table:

  • many INSERTs
  • many UPDATEs
  • some DELETE (rows > 1 hour) from time to time

Example:

Table is defined with fixed-length fields only and some indexes.

CREATE TABLE `tbl_log` (
  `ip` int(4) unsigned NOT NULL,
  `date` datetime NOT NULL,
  `external_id` smallint(6) unsigned NOT NULL,
  `counter` smallint(6) unsigned NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
  PRIMARY KEY (`ip`,`external_id`),
  KEY `external_id` (`external_id`),
  KEY `counter` (`counter`),
  KEY `date_idx` (`date`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;

Inserts (and updates, through on duplicate key) may look like this (ip and external_id will vary):

INSERT INTO tbl_log
  SET ip = INET_ATON('192.168.1.1'),
      date = now(),
      external_id = 123,
      counter = 0
  ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE counter=counter+1;

Finally, deleting old rows will be done with a query:

DELETE FROM tbl_log WHERE date < DATE_SUB(NOW(), INTERVAL 1 HOUR);

Question:

Will such a table fragment over time?

If so, I think I should defragment it. If necessary, I planned to run OPTIMIZE TABLE tbl_log; (with option innodb-defragment=1) right after delete...

0

I would say yes for four(4) major reasons

  1. Page Boundaries / Index Pages
  2. Index Layout
  3. Index Statistics
  4. Bulk DML

PAGE BOUNDARIES / INDEX PAGES

According to the MySQL Documentation on Limits on InnoDB tables

The maximum row length, except for variable-length columns (VARBINARY, VARCHAR, BLOB and TEXT), is slightly less than half of a page for 4KB, 8KB, 16KB, and 32KB page sizes. For example, the maximum row length for the default innodb_page_size of 16KB is about 8000 bytes. For an InnoDB page size of 64KB, the maximum row length is about 16000 bytes. LONGBLOB and LONGTEXT columns must be less than 4GB, and the total row length, including BLOB and TEXT columns, must be less than 4GB.

Your table uses INT UNSIGNED (4 bytes), DATETIME (8 bytes), 2 SMALLINTs (4 bytes) per row. That's a total of 16 bytes per row. This means you can fit 1000 rows into a single InnoDB page, but there is a very small piece of fragmentation. Using the default innodb_page_size (16K or 16384), there will be 384 bytes of fragmentation with a page. It is most likely used for mapping the data within the one page.

Doing mass INSERTs, DELETEs, and UPDATEs will generate many pages with empty space for whole rows that are marked as unused. This is in addition to the 384 bytes region of the data page.

INDEX LAYOUT

You will generate many index pages

  • You have a 6-byte PRIMARY KEY
  • Each secondary index carries a copy of the PRIMARY KEY
  • KEY external_id (external_id), will be 8 bytes (SMALLINT + PRIMARY KEY)
  • KEY counter (counter), will be 8 bytes (SMALLINT + PRIMARY KEY)
  • KEY date_idx (date) will be 14 bytes (DATE + PRIMARY KEY)
  • 36 bytes for indexing a single row
  • Indexes are represented as BTREEs, so you are looking at O(n log n) space utilization. If you account for non-leaf page splits, many index pages will be 50% empty (without question).

INDEX STATISTICS

Running INSERTs, DELETEs, and UPDATEs will skew index stats since index cardinalities will frequently change. You need to run ANALYZE TABLE tbl_log;. Running OPTIMIZE TABLE tbl_log; will defrag the tables and run ANALYZE TABLE tbl_log; as the last step (See my post from Feb 27, 2013 : What is the difference between optimize table and analyze table in mysql)

BULK DML

The DELETE query you will be doing by the hour is a bulk operation. Many rows will need a ton of housecleaning to keep up with marking rows deleted.

  • No, you can't hold 1000 rows per page. There is per-column, per-row, and per-block overheads. You'll be lucky to get 500 rows/block. – Rick James Mar 23 '18 at 0:55
  • DATETIME is no longer 8 bytes, but only 5 in newer versions. – Rick James Mar 23 '18 at 0:57
  • The PK is 9 bytes, not 6. Hence, all the math about secondary keys is off. Plus there is overhead in secondary key BTrees. – Rick James Mar 23 '18 at 0:57
  • Block splits lead to the BTree being an average of 69% full. This is not bad, and should be ignored. – Rick James Mar 23 '18 at 1:00
0

I say "no" for various reasons.

  • The fragmentation will recur promptly after the OPTIMIZE, so why bother.
  • The fragmentation is not that big a deal. The performance issue is minimal. The "depth" of the BTrees rarely changes due to fragmentation.
  • InnoDB tends to get rid of fragmentation by combining adjacent blocks that are under half full. So, again, why bother doing an OPTIMIZE.
  • Your question asks about "fixed-length" fields -- that applies only to MyISAM, which has a radically different table structure.

Does the DELETE take a long time? Is it a burden on the rest of the activity in the server? If so, there is a much better solution than OPTIMIZE... Partition.

I would consider partitioning on 5-minute intervals. And do a DROP PARTITION every 5 minutes. It will be a lot less invasive than a big DELETE. More discussion: http://mysql.rjweb.org/doc.php/partitionmaint

How often do you currently do the DELETE? Even if you don't go with PARTITIONing, write a script that continually repeats the DELETE. This will decrease the impact significantly over any approach using cron.

Side issues:

Indexing counter is quite a burden. Each time a counter is updated, the old index entry needs to be removed and an new entry needs to be added somewhere else.

Why are deleting on date? You might be bumping the counter one second, then deleting the row the next second.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.