I am working on the database dump of this exact stack exchange section. While I am working on it I have encountered one issue that I am currently unable to solve.

In the XML File Posts.xml the contents look like this

enter image description here

There are of course multiple rows, but that's how one looks like. There's already a Tags.xml file given in the dump, which makes it even more obvious that the "Tags" attribute in that picture is in fact supposed to be its separate table (many to many).

So right now I am trying to figure out a way how to extract the tags. Here's what I tried to do:

CREATE TABLE #TestingIdea (
PostId int NULL,
Tag nvarchar (MAX) NULL

↑ The table I created to test out my code. I have already filled it with the Tags and PostIds

SELECT  T1.PostId,
    SELECT  T.PostId, 
            cast('<X>'+ REPLACE(T.Tag,'>','</X><X>') + '</X>' as XML) AS NewTag
    FROM #TestingIdea AS T
    ) AS T1
    SELECT tData.value('.','nvarchar(30)') SplitTag
    FROM T1.NewTag.nodes('X') AS T(tData)
    ) AS S

Yet this code returns this error

XML parsing: line 1, character 37, illegal qualified name character

After googling this error (including here), whatever people had (like extra " marks or different CHAR sets) I didn't have. So I am kind of stuck. Maybe I missed something extremely obvious from previous answers I found T_T In any case I appreciate any help and advice on how to tackle this. It's the last table I have yet to normalize.

Small Sample Data From the XML File https://pastebin.com/AW0Z8Be2 For anyone interested in the program I use to view XML files (so it's much easier to read like in that picture above). It's called FOXE XML Reader (Free XML Editor - First Object)

  • So do you need the tags one by one as a result? What is the exact result you need? Do you have sample data to work with? – Randi Vertongen Dec 15 '18 at 19:22
  • 1
    Yea I need them to be 1 by 1. This is how the data looks like in my database right now i.gyazo.com/6b7408201f18ebcbf888cc0f8b36cb27.png All I have is the XML file for my data – Chessbrain Dec 15 '18 at 19:28
  • Are you by any chance on sql server 2016? Thinking about string split? – Randi Vertongen Dec 15 '18 at 19:33
  • 1
    SQL Server 2017. And yes, I am basically doing string splitting – Chessbrain Dec 15 '18 at 19:37
  • Okay, I added something, if it is wrong, let me know and I will adapt or delete it – Randi Vertongen Dec 15 '18 at 19:42

Does something like this satisfy the resultset?

Table & Data

CREATE TABLE #TestingIdea (
PostId int NULL,
Tag nvarchar (MAX) NULL

INSERT INTO #TestingIdea(PostId,Tag)



SELECT PostId, RIGHT(value,len(value)-1) as SplitTag
FROM #TestingIdea 
CROSS APPLY string_split(tag,'>')
WHERE value != ''


PostId  SplitTag
1   mysql
1   innodb
1   myisam
  • 1
    Indeed it does O_O First of all, thank you! Makes my "complicated" code look like sht lol Would be kind enough as to explain how that query works? I am obvious still new with xQuery stuff. I understand that you removed the last '>' on the far right. But I don't understand how the '<' at the beginning got removed? – Chessbrain Dec 15 '18 at 19:51
  • 1
    Hey, no problem! I was lucky that you used a version of SQL Server 2016 or above. The String_Split gets, like you saw rid of the '>' tag, and creates a new row by 'cross applying' the function. So when i just get the 'value' from the string split, without applying the RIGHT() function, it will show as <mysql for example. So what i did, and there might be better solutions, is just get the value, and the length of the value - 1, and applied the RIGHT() function to that. This means that the first character of the value returned will not be returned. resulting into 'mysql' instead of <mysql. – Randi Vertongen Dec 15 '18 at 19:55
  • 1
    I am assuming this means that versions prior to SQL 2016 didn't have the string_split function? – Chessbrain Dec 15 '18 at 20:02
  • 1
    Indeed, they had to create a custom function like the one in this link: stackoverflow.com/questions/10914576/t-sql-split-string – Randi Vertongen Dec 15 '18 at 20:05

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.