I saw a concise TSQL statement that effectively splits a string into its constituent characters, one per line, for the purpose of evaluating the ascii value on each character.

If I am reading the query correctly, effectively, 3 CTEs are being used to prepare a table of 1 column containing 10,000 rows, each with the value '0'.

A fourth CTE is defined as follows:

cteTally(n) AS(
    FROM E4

Subsequently, this CTE is joined to a table containing a column with the strings of interest, with the following select:

SELECT n, SUBSTRING(LastName, n, 1), ASCII( SUBSTRING(LastName, n, 1))

That is, row number n, then the nth character in LastName, then the ascii value of that character.

My questions relate to the over clause in the CTE above.

Essentially, what exactly is it doing?

If we are querying row_number from 10,000 identical rows, why do we need an order by clause at all? Why is the order by put into an over clause rather than as an order by clause for the select statement - especially as the over clause isn't even specifying any partition? (I presume this means the window over which row_number operates is the full 10,000 rows?) And what does it mean to order by select null?


2 Answers 2


ROW_NUMBER() is a ranking window function, and ranking window functions require a mandatory ORDER BY clause. If you try to write it without the ORDER BY you will get a syntax error.

FROM (VALUES ('A'), ('B'), ('C')) AS X(Y);
-- Msg 4112, Level 15, State 1, Line 1 
-- The function 'ROW_NUMBER' must have an OVER clause with ORDER BY.

The trick with the subquery was discovered by someone who blogged about it, as a performance optimization. SQL Server always performs a sort operation since constants are not allowed for the ORDER BY clause:

FROM (VALUES ('A'), ('B'), ('C')) AS X(Y);
-- Msg 5309, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
-- Windowed functions, aggregates and NEXT VALUE FOR functions 
-- do not support constants as ORDER BY clause expressions.

And neither are integers which are treated as indices:

FROM (VALUES ('A'), ('B'), ('C')) AS X(Y);
-- Msg 5308, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
-- Windowed functions, aggregates and NEXT VALUE FOR functions 
-- do not support integer indices as ORDER BY clause expressions.

Turns out that due to some glitch in the code, you can circumvent this limitation by using a subquery, which for some reason is allowed, and eliminates the sort operator.

FROM (VALUES ('A'), ('B'), ('C')) AS X(Y);

No Sort Operator

You can use any constant in the sub query, the NULL is probably a reminiscent of the habit of using SELECT NULL within EXISTS predicates, which in the early history of SQL Server had a performance impact as opposed to * or any other column expression, as the optimizer wasn't smart enough to ignore it.


UPDATE @Erik-Darling commented that you can also circumvent it by using a computed expressions:

  • Thank you. Sure does. I can see most of my questions fall over like a house of cards on "windows functions require a mandatory order by clause". The MS docs on the over clause say order by is optional - but I guess this means partitions might be used without window functions (and not require an order by). Nice username! Feb 21, 2019 at 0:35
  • 3
    Not all window functions require an ORDER BY. Only ranking window functions - ROW_NUMBER(), RANK(), DENSE_RANK(), NTILE(). Providing a PARTITION BY or not is irrelevant. Feb 21, 2019 at 0:38
  • 2
    You can do SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY 1/0); Feb 21, 2019 at 2:38

The OVER clause sets the ordering (and partitioning if PARTITION BY is included) of the row set before applying the selected Windowing function. As you can use multiple Window functions in a single query, each requires its own partitioning and ordering to ensure the data is returned as desired.

In your example, ROW_NUMBER() is being used to generate a sequential row number for each row in the CTE. SELECT NULL is used because there is no particular order required but an ORDER BY clause is required for a windowing function.

Another way of achieving the same thing would be using an IDENTITY column, however, that has other implications and requires changes to an existing table, or a temp table to be created. The ROW_NUMBER window function in a CTE allows for this identity to be generated on the fly.

To answer your specific question:

Essentially, what exactly is it doing?

It is ordering the rows in E4 'randomly' before applying the ROW_NUMBER() window function to that result set to produce a list of row numbers equal to the number of rows in E4. OVER can be translated as "Fetch me a result set with this ordering and partitioning and apply (OVER) this window function to that result set independent of the ordering in the main SELECT statement."

More info: OVER Clause

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.