I have the following query:


SET @p__linq__0 = '... some guid ...'

    [EventId] AS [EventId],       
    [DateCreated] AS [DateCreated],       
    [LocationId] AS [LocationId],       
    [SourceName] AS [SourceName],       
    [SourceState] AS [SourceState],       
    [Priority] AS [Priority],       
    [EventDescription] AS [EventDescription],       
    [FirstTrigger] AS [FirstTrigger]
FROM [dbo].[Watchdog]
    [LocationId] = @p__linq__0
    [FirstTrigger] = 1
ORDER BY [DateCreated] DESC

Watchdog table defines 2 indecies:

  1. Clustered index on EventId primary key column
  2. Unclustered index on DateCreated column

This is actual execution plan for the query: enter image description here

Reading other posts on how to eliminate key lookup I added another non-clustered index which includes all columns from SELECT

CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [LocationId_FirstTrigger] ON [dbo].[Watchdog]
    [LocationId] ASC,
    [FirstTrigger] ASC
INCLUDE (   [EventId],

However, this didn't help and actual execution plan is the same. If I look at key lookup the output is actually included in newly added non clustered index.

enter image description here

My question is, why it's still doing key lookup instead of index scan/seek ?


Following some suggestions in the comments, I dropped newly created non clustered index & instead recreated non clustered index on DateCreated column including columns from SELECT.

Now execution plan is the following:

enter image description here

Also query execution time dropped from 1+ minute to few seconds (this table has 18+ million rows).

Does this mean key lookup was done due to ORDER BY on non-clustered index ?


2 Answers 2


My question is, why it's still doing key lookup instead of index scan/seek ?

The query specifies that results should be ordered by DateCreated. Since you already had a nonclustered index on DateCreated, the optimizer decided that the cost of doing key lookups was lower than sorting all of the data by DateCreated.

Does this mean key lookup was done due to ORDER BY on non-clustered index ?

Essentially, yes. It was estimated to be cheaper* to read the data in the required order, and get any additional fields through a key lookup, rather than reading all of the fields from a single index and then sorting it by DateCreated.

You could confirm this by comparing the estimated costs between

  • the original query (with the original indexes), and
  • the original query with an index hint

The index hint would be like this on the FROM line:

FROM [dbo].[Watchdog] WITH (INDEX (LocationId_FirstTrigger))

This should produce a plan with no key lookups (since LocationId_FirstTrigger is covering for that query), and a Sort operator. I'd expect the "Estimated Cost" to be higher, thus the other plan was chosen.

* To explain the optimizer's choice here:

The TOP (1) in your query means the optimizer sets a row goal, meaning the plan is geared toward producing one row quickly. The optimizer expects to find one row from the Index Scan matching your LocationId predicate very quickly, since it assumes values are distributed uniformly. This may or may not be true in reality. The cost of one Key Lookup following the Index Scan is pretty small.

The scan + lookup option therefore looks cheaper to the optimizer than finding matches using LocationId_FirstTrigger and sorting. You can turn the row goal logic off for the query as a test by adding an OPTION (QUERYTRACEON 4138) hint. You will likely find the optimizer then chooses the LocationId_FirstTrigger index without an index hint.

Still, the best alternative is to modify your index as Mikael Eriksson suggests.


You should move the column DateCreated to the key columns in the index LocationId_FirstTrigger.

Then you will get a seek on LocationId and FirstTrigger and a backward scan of the index to locate the row with highest value of DateCreated according to select top(1) ... order by DateCreated desc.

CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [LocationId_FirstTrigger] ON [dbo].[Watchdog]
    [LocationId] ASC,
    [FirstTrigger] ASC,

If the index is not ordered by DateCreated SQL Server will have to read all matching rows and sort them to know what row to return.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.