1

Postgres 9.4.9 has a fix in it's release notes which reads (emphasis mine):

Prevent possible failure when vacuuming multixact IDs in an installation that has been pg_upgrade'd from pre-9.3 (Andrew Gierth, Álvaro Herrera)

The usual symptom of this bug is errors like "MultiXactId NNN has not been created yet -- apparent wraparound".

I am currently chasing errors in PG 9.4.5 which read:

2019-10-19 15:37:17 EDT [13024]: [1-1] ERROR:  MultiXactId 1074790449 does no longer exist -- apparent wraparound

Does the above fix in PG 9.4.9 address the error I am getting?

| improve this question | |
  • dba.stackexchange.com/questions/143516/… - This question led me to look at PG 9.4.9 . I have tried to trace through the old mailing list threads to determine the answer to my own question but I'm not immediately seeing this one way or the other. – Freiheit Oct 21 '19 at 15:41
  • 2
    Good question. I'd assume that it could lead to both of these errors, but I am not sure. You should always install the latest minor release anyway; running 9.4.9 borders on criminal negligence. Try and see! – Laurenz Albe Oct 22 '19 at 6:19
0

I upgraded to PG 9.6.8. This particular environment is a legacy application that runs on an "appliance" style deployment so I'm forced into only updating to certain versions. 9.6.8 was the smallest increment I could take.

The initially appeared to have solved the MultiXactId xxxx does no longer exist problem with some simple queries. Subsequent queries to create indexes failed with the original error.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    You should really be upgrading to the latest 9.6 version. – a_horse_with_no_name Oct 28 '19 at 14:40
  • Thanks for the reminder @a_horse_with_no_name . Once this wraparound problem is solved, there is some version of PG 10 that I can upgrade to and I'll be making plans to push it forward. – Freiheit Oct 28 '19 at 14:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.