In the following schema:
Collections
Upvotes
Reports
Upvotes
Reviews
Upvotes
I'm tempted to have a single Upvotes
table with a single "entityId"
column that stores either the CollectionId
, ReportId
, or ReviewId
. There will also be an enum for Type
- storing either collection
, report
, or review
.
The entityId
will always be required, and the logic will always make sure that inserts enforce uniqueness across each type
.
The benefits of this is that adding another type is just a matter of expanding the enum. Everything will live on a single table with no redundancy.
The cost seems to be the added complexity on the logic side, which is contained to the one place in my application logic that inserts new entities into the table.
Practically speaking, is there anything wrong with this approach? What would be some other reasons to avoid this?