1

Could you please help me tune this query. It takes over half an hour to run! I want to identify repeat bookings (can only be identified using an annoying varchar field - email)

UPDATE #Repeats --a temp table
SET    Repeats = (SELECT Count(col1)
                  FROM   Booking b1 -- a massive table -- 8 million rows
                  WHERE  email IN --a varchar(100) field
                         (SELECT Email
                          FROM   Booking b2
                          WHERE  DateDiff(day, b2.BookedDate, b1.BookedDate) > 1)
                         AND BookingStatusId != 7
                         AND #Repeats.BookedMonth = MOnth(BookedDate)
                         AND #Repeats.BookedYear = Year(BookedDate)
                         AND #Repeats.Code COLLATE Latin1_General_CI_AS = CONVERT(VARCHAR, b1.Code)
                         AND b1.BookedById = 5) 

The table has a columnstore index that the plan is picking up.. Even then it is slow. If I drop the columnstore index, then the plan uses the nonclustered index on email. Thus there are two indexes on booking table. 1. columnstore index 2. nonclustered index on email.

I'm thinking along the lines of joins (instead of 'where email in') or using Window functions. Since I am not very well versed in these areas, I am a bit lost.

  • In your query plan what object is consuming most of query time ? Do you have index seek or index scans ? Did you tried DTA or sp_blitzindex ? – Kuba Miazek Dec 27 '13 at 12:44
  • 3
    Table definitions including indexes? Execution Plan? – Martin Smith Dec 27 '13 at 13:08
1

You should look at the Execution Plan and see where most of the cost is for the query. Without the results of the Execution Plan it is difficult to offer advice.

I suspect the query optimizer is using the best process possible for the query as it is structured. You might try breaking the query into smaller parts, like query the email field to get the results into a temp table first, then run your main query using the temp table of emails.

The might not make the query run faster, but this might expose information in the Execution Plan that will help you troubleshoot.

Another option is to use include to add columns to your non-clustered index to return all the values in the index scan to maybe speed up the process.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.