So let me first start the question with my understanding of how MongoDb stores data on disk: So when you create a database in mongodb, it allocates a large file named <databasename>.0 and within that file allocates extents that are contiguous regions that correspond to data for a particular collection or particular index.

At such point as this datafile is filled, it creates a new file called <databasename>.1 and populates it in a similar way. Therefore it seems sensible to assume that the most recently inserted data into a particular database will be in the highest numbered file (and my performance tests confirm this).

However, I can't see how this could be true for indices... since we're talking about a bTree, it doesn't seem possible/sensible to have this bTree scattered across files in the same way. As Mongo is doing the maintenance for an index, does the whole index live in one extent until it outgrows it at which point it is relocated to the current (highest numbered datafile)?.

This has become important to me as when starting a database from Amazon EBS snapshot, it seems there's a huge overhead for hitting these datafiles until the volume warms up. I am only interested in a subset of the most recent N documents from a collection. If I could be sure I was only going to need the most recent couple of datafiles I could prewarm these files by reading sequentially before starting mongod.

1 Answer 1


The delay you are seeing when loading from a snapshot is not cause by how indexes are laid out on disk, it's far more likely that you are seeing the delay because when you start an instance from a snapshot, the data is loaded only on first use, and will be significantly slower than subsequent uses - that is a basic limitation of using snapshots in this way and really has little to do with the application that is trying to access disk. That's why you will see guides on "how to warm up an EBS volume" and the like (there are penalties on writing for the first time too). If you do that (warm up the disk with another application like dd for example) and the performance issue goes away, then you have pretty decent proof that the layout of data has nothing to do with the issue.

Along those lines, MongoDB has the touch command that will allow you to warm up the data before you use it in anger (you can touch data, data and indexes or just indexes). Again, after you initially attach the volume, it will be slow, and touch is going to take a while, but at least after that warming up phase, your results should be somewhat consistent.

In terms of how things are stored on disk, you have the basics correct in terms of file allocation but there is a logical structure within the files, extents, that are the real units of storage. That and far more is covered in detail by this presentation by Mathias Stearn - one of the kernel developers at MongoDB.

Indexes are just another (structured) form of data in MongoDB and they are stored in linked extents throughout the file. Fragmentation can become an issue (that's what the compact command is for) as can disk space used (the repair command is used to reclaim) but you haven't described a workload that would immediately make me think you are hitting a fragmentation issue which is why I suspect something else (like the first use penalty) is your root cause.

  • I accepted this answer as it was well written and furthered my understanding however I do believe that how indexes are stored on disk is relevant in the EBS startup scenario seeing as the warming of a volume involves targeting particular files. For the record, I found for my application that prewarming the last two mongodb datafiles of the relevant database on EBS (by copying them to /dev/null!) achieves a decent speedup over just starting mongod cold. Commented May 19, 2014 at 13:48
  • 1
    You would hit all the relevant blocks for indexes by using the touch command with the indexes option, which would remove any doubt as to what you have paged in. If you want to see exactly what has made it in, then check out this tool: eng.wish.com/mongomem-memory-usage-by-collection-in-mongodb
    – Adam C
    Commented May 19, 2014 at 14:16
  • Ah missed that. Top tip! Commented May 19, 2014 at 14:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.