user_id
,currency_id
, andtransaction_amount
are all defined asNOT NULL
columns indbo.transactions
It looks to me that SQL Server has a blanket assumption that an aggregate can produce a null
even if the field(s) it operates on are not null
. This is obviously true in certain cases:
create table foo(bar integer not null);
select sum(bar) from foo
-- returns 1 row with `null` field
And is also true in the generalized versions of group by
like cube
This simpler test case illustrates the point that any aggregate is interpreted as being nullable:
CREATE VIEW dbo.balances
with schemabinding
AS
SELECT
user_id
, sum(1) AS balance_amount
FROM dbo.transactions
GROUP BY
user_id
;
GO
IMO this is a limitation (albeit a minor one) of SQL Server - some other RDBMSs allow the creation of certain constraints on views that are not enforced and exist only to give clues to the optimizer, though I think 'uniqueness' is more likely to help in generating a good query plan than 'nullability'
If the nullability of the column is important, perhaps for use with an ORM, consider wrapping the indexed view in another view that simply guarantees the non-nullability using ISNULL
:
CREATE VIEW dbo.balancesORM
WITH SCHEMABINDING
AS
SELECT
B.[user_id],
B.currency_id,
balance_amount = ISNULL(B.balance_amount, 0),
transaction_count = ISNULL(B.transaction_count, 0)
FROM dbo.balances AS B;