I am looking for the most efficient way to reference multiple tables in one table, when there is only one reference possible at a time. Which means tables A and B are referenced by table C, but both A and B cannot be referenced in a single row in C, and I choose which one I look into when I write my query. I have thought about 4 ways of doing this : - Having a column `type` and a column `FK` so I can make joins like `type = 'A' AND a.pk = c.a_fk` (this is what we use right now) - Using inheritance : Both A and B inherit a sequence from a "parent" table and C has a foreign key to the "parent" table, but this is not possible with PostgreSQL - Using the same principle as the inheritance but with another table D. Both A and B have a reference to D, C also has a reference to D, and I can do a join like `FROM c JOIN a ON a.d_fk = c.d_fk` - Using a column by table I want to have a foreign key to In every solution I tried, the query planner is wrong about how many rows will be returned. Here is an example : I created a simple database where I have 3 tables like so : Table "public.a" Column | Type | Collation | Nullable | Default --------+--------+-----------+----------+------------------------------- pk | bigint | | not null | nextval('a_pk_seq'::regclass) Table "public.b" Column | Type | Collation | Nullable | Default --------+--------+-----------+----------+------------------------------- pk | bigint | | not null | nextval('b_pk_seq'::regclass) Table "public.c" Column | Type | Collation | Nullable | Default --------+--------+-----------+----------+------------------------------- pk | bigint | | not null | nextval('c_pk_seq'::regclass) a_fk | bigint | | | b_fk | bigint | | | Indexes: "c_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (pk) "c_a_fk_idx" btree (a_fk) "c_b_fk_idx" btree (b_fk) Foreign-key constraints: "c_a_fk_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (a_fk) REFERENCES a(pk) "c_b_fk_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (b_fk) REFERENCES b(pk) - A is filled with 20 rows, B with 10000. - C is also filled with 10000, both a_fk and b_fk cannot be filled at the same time. All rows are filled with b_fk (which must be unique) except for 5 rows where a_fk is filled (which must be unique too). So when I run this query : SELECT * FROM a JOIN c ON a.pk = c.a_fk; I would except the planner to think the query will return 5 rows. Instead, this is what I got : Merge Join (cost=1.76..1.94 rows=10000 width=32) (actual time=0.035..0.051 rows=5 loops=1) Merge Cond: (a.pk = c.a_fk) -> Sort (cost=1.63..1.68 rows=20 width=8) (actual time=0.024..0.028 rows=15 loops=1) Sort Key: a.pk Sort Method: quicksort Memory: 25kB -> Seq Scan on a (cost=0.00..1.20 rows=20 width=8) (actual time=0.009..0.013 rows=20 loops=1) -> Index Scan using c_a_fk_idx1 on c (cost=0.13..24.21 rows=10000 width=24) (actual time=0.006..0.012 rows=5 loops=1) Planning time: 0.297 ms Execution time: 0.088 ms I tried to create a partial index `CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON c (b_fk) WHERE a_fk IS NULL` but it didn't change anything. The only thing that improved the plan was to add a NULL check on b_fk like this : SELECT * FROM a JOIN c ON a.pk = c.a_fk WHERE c.a_fk IS NOT NULL; Which gives this plan : Merge Join (cost=1.92..6.05 rows=5 width=32) (actual time=0.031..0.046 rows=5 loops=1) Merge Cond: (c.a_fk = a.pk) -> Index Scan using c_a_fk_idx on c (cost=0.29..20.37 rows=5 width=24) (actual time=0.005..0.012 rows=5 loops=1) Index Cond: (a_fk IS NOT NULL) -> Sort (cost=1.63..1.68 rows=20 width=8) (actual time=0.022..0.024 rows=15 loops=1) Sort Key: a.pk Sort Method: quicksort Memory: 25kB -> Seq Scan on a (cost=0.00..1.20 rows=20 width=8) (actual time=0.006..0.007 rows=20 loops=1) Planning time: 0.559 ms Execution time: 0.086 ms But it still gets it wrong for the rows in A and I think there must be another way to help the query planner, one that doesn't involve adding a "useless" NULL check for every column that should be NULL. I tried on both Postgres 9.6 and 11, I would prefer a solution for 9.6 because this is what we use but I would accept a solution for 11.