Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with insert
Search options not deleted
user 104370
A core statement in SQL that does what it says on the tin: inserts data into a table.
2
votes
1
answer
2k
views
What is faster - insert into new table, or delete from existing table?
Insert statement:
INSERT INTO NewTable (C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, C6, C7)
SELECT OldTable1.C1, OldTable1.C2, OldTable1.C3, OldTable1.C4, OldTable1.C5, OldTable1.C6, OldTable1.C7
FROM OldTable1
INNER JOIN …
- 177
4
votes
2
answers
531
views
Will a clustered index speed up this query? (Inner join with a where clause)
Here is the query:
INSERT INTO NewTable (C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, C6, C7)
SELECT OldTable1.C1, OldTable1.C2, OldTable1.C3, OldTable1.C4, OldTable1.C5, OldTable1.C6, OldTable1.C7
FROM OldTable1
INNER JOIN …
- 177