Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with normalization
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 126936
Normalization is the process of organizing columns into tables within a relational database in such a way as to minimize redundancy and avoid insertion, update and deletion anomalies.
0
votes
Accepted
Are functional depencies with boolean conditions a thing?
Because the relationship is not a functional dependency, splitting this relation wouldn't be a normalization. …
- 47.6k
14
votes
Accepted
Should stored financial transactions include some data redundancy?
It's quite common to store the results of calculations like this so you record the fact of the financial transaction, not what you think should have happened. Also because storing the results allows …
- 47.6k
4
votes
Accepted
Does relational design discourage splitting tables unnecessarily?
Whether fixing other schema design problems counts as “Normalization” can be debated, but in general parlance Normalization just means ensuring the database complies with some Normal Form. …
- 47.6k
1
vote
If `AB->C` and `A->B` , `A->C`?
For each a in A, there's exactly one b in B because A->B.
So given a, we get (a,b). And for each (a,b) there's exactly one c in C, since AB->C.
So for each a in A there's exactly one c in C.
So by de …
- 47.6k
1
vote
JSON vs Record/Struct type in a DB
The answer goes way back to relational theory, and the idea that column values should always be scalars. Arrays, structs, and nested result sets can alternatively be modeled as separate tables, and n …
- 47.6k
1
vote
Weak Entities + Partial Keys + 2NF
In practice it's often not, but for the purposes of normalization it's just the trailing column of the primary key. …
- 47.6k
9
votes
Accepted
Alternatives to storing a record with exactly n multiple foreign keys from the same foreign ...
Are there official terms for this type of scenario?
Yes. This is a Symmetric Relation. And "relation" here has the same meaning as in "Relational Database". An RDBMS is a database management s …
- 47.6k
2
votes
Why is it considered that a set unnormalizes a database absolutely?
“Normalized” just means the the model follows a standard convention for Relational Databases. It doesn’t mean that it’s better or worse.
It’s simply the definition of what a Relational Database is t …
- 47.6k
4
votes
Does an excessive table violate normalization rules?
does the first example violate some known rule of database normalization or some other mathematical principle? Or is it just a case of poor design?
Neither. … It has no obvious defects of either normalization or good design.
It sensibly models the propositions like the following:
There's a school named 'School1'.
There's a ClubType named 'Spanish Club'. …
- 47.6k
6
votes
Accepted
What normalization rules does this table break
This is a terrible pattern, but it doesn't actually break any normalization rules. The reason is that it's actually a change in what you are modeling. …
- 47.6k