Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with deadlock
Search options not deleted
user 247524
A situation caused by two or more processes being unable to proceed (and thus release their locks) because they are blocked by locks on resources held by the other process.
2
votes
0
answers
542
views
Is this the correct way to select with updlock and then conditionally insert?
Edit: updated with deadlock graph and query plan
Column names are slightly different to the initial question, but the logic is the same. … PortfolioId = GroupId, Currency = Asset
Deadlock XML: https://pastebin.com/YPeA7xbU
Query plan:
https://www.brentozar.com/pastetheplan/?id=B1RP6Vd9c …
- 263