Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with performance
Search options not deleted
user 269614
An evaluation of whether a system works well enough to be fit for purpose. Normally performance refers to the speed with which a system completes an operation or set of operations over time.
0
votes
Postgresql query takes unnecessary (?) long time
The problem was, I am using an ORM, which obviously drops the performance, when returning results with many relations (even if they are not joined and selected!). … When asking for the raw result set, the performance is just as good as it should be. …
- 111
1
vote
1
answer
155
views
Postgresql query takes unnecessary (?) long time
Or are indizes only helping with performance while joining over tables?
Damaged/inconsitent tables? What is a good starting point to learn about VACUUM, INDEX, REINDEX?
... ? …
- 111