Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with dac
Search options questions only
not deleted
user 68127
Dedicated Admin Console (DAC) a reserved connection on SQL Server that grants special access to system tables and can help diagnose problems
2
votes
0
answers
41
views
DAC silently swallows tokenization errors in sp_msforeachdb
This morning I hopped on the DAC to check something out. Oops, I made a typo!
1> exec sp_msforeachdb N'
2~ use [?]
3~ select N'?' … You will note that no error message is returned from the batch 1 (indicated by the 1> on the newline after go)
Maybe errors get handle differently in the DAC? …
- 5,001