Timeline for Achieving "sequence number", rather than dateTime, for updates; postgres specifically
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:40 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Dec 7, 2016 at 21:01 | comment | added | Taryn | I've cleaned up the comments here, please keep them constructive about the answer. And @EvanCarroll leave the unnecessary commentary about other products out of answers. | |
| Dec 7, 2016 at 20:00 | history | edited | Andriy M | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
removed fragment of citation not found in original
|
| Dec 7, 2016 at 19:22 | history | edited | Evan Carroll | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 231 characters in body
|
| Dec 7, 2016 at 18:10 | comment | added | Evan Carroll | Why? You never explain explain why you want that to be sequential? Does it matter if you get back 1, or 29894? | |
| Dec 7, 2016 at 18:08 | history | edited | Evan Carroll | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 217 characters in body
|
| Dec 7, 2016 at 18:07 | comment | added | Fattie | Hi Evan, thanks a million, but the need is for an actual sequence. | |
| Dec 7, 2016 at 18:05 | history | answered | Evan Carroll | CC BY-SA 3.0 |