Skip to main content
15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 5, 2022 at 14:12 comment added Mikko Rantalainen @a_horse_with_no_name Most SSD devices have huge performance difference between sequential data vs true random access. The difference is not nearly as big as with HDDs but the difference is still there. Practically the only exception is Intel Optane SSD – those devices have so good random read performance that there you can probably set random_page_cost to seq_page_cost without any problem even in edge cases.
S Apr 27, 2018 at 9:29 history bounty ended guettli
S Apr 27, 2018 at 9:29 history notice removed guettli
Apr 27, 2018 at 9:29 vote accept guettli
Apr 25, 2018 at 1:16 history tweeted twitter.com/StackDBAs/status/988949832135069697
Apr 24, 2018 at 10:43 history edited guettli CC BY-SA 3.0
vs
Apr 23, 2018 at 9:29 history edited guettli CC BY-SA 3.0
added 306 characters in body
Apr 23, 2018 at 9:27 comment added guettli @a_horse_with_no_name I don't understand you comment. You say they are not used for writing. That's true. But why not create some tables do some benchmarking and finally show matching values? I updated the question.
Apr 22, 2018 at 15:03 comment added user1822 random_page_cost and seq_page_cost only apply for reading data. I don't think they are used for any write activity.
Apr 22, 2018 at 5:31 comment added Evan Carroll @a_horse_with_no_name two reads from different chips can be pipelined with an SSD, and if you write sequentially I believe the writes get balanced to the different chips.
Apr 22, 2018 at 5:26 answer added Evan Carroll timeline score: 13
Apr 20, 2018 at 9:37 comment added user1822 For a SSD, I think it's safe to set random_page_cost to 1 as there is no difference in performance between random access and sequential access on a SSD if I'm not mistaken
S Apr 20, 2018 at 9:30 history bounty started guettli
S Apr 20, 2018 at 9:30 history notice added guettli Draw attention
Apr 17, 2018 at 12:25 history asked guettli CC BY-SA 3.0