I have a view which is amazingly slow :) It joins two tables only, having a few simple WHERE conditions and one in a form of a subquery (see SubPlan1 below). The simplest condition is checked as an index scan, which is somehow terribly slow:
QUERY PLAN
Result (cost=19.41..570789.79 rows=18 width=4) (actual time=18724.919..18724.919 rows=0 loops=1)
One-Time Filter: ((hashed SubPlan 2) AND (('now'::text)::time with time zone >= ($2)::time with time zone) AND (('now'::text)::time with time zone <= ($3)::time with time zone))
InitPlan 3 (returns $2)
-> Function Scan on f_konstansok_select f (cost=0.26..0.27 rows=1 width=146) (actual time=0.147..0.147 rows=1 loops=1)
InitPlan 4 (returns $3)
-> Function Scan on f_konstansok_select f (cost=0.26..0.27 rows=1 width=146) (actual time=0.103..0.103 rows=1 loops=1)
-> Nested Loop (cost=18.87..570789.25 rows=18 width=4) (actual time=18724.357..18724.357 rows=0 loops=1)
Join Filter: (((ml.idopont_tervezett)::timestamp without time zone < now()) OR ((ml.idopont_tervezett IS NULL) AND ((ml.idopont + (((ms.hatarido)::text || ' minutes'::text))::interval) < now())))
-> Nested Loop Semi Join (cost=0.00..570746.76 rows=42 width=45) (actual time=6.393..18711.516 rows=61 loops=1)
-> Index Scan using idx_munkalap_lepes_aktualis on munkalap_lepes ml (cost=0.00..570080.42 rows=1634 width=45) (actual time=6.379..18678.306 rows=3256 loops=1)
Index Cond: (aktualis = true)
Filter: (NOT (SubPlan 1))
SubPlan 1
-> Nested Loop (cost=681.75..2041.93 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=5.712..5.712 rows=0 loops=3268)
-> Hash Join (cost=681.75..2033.65 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=5.711..5.711 rows=0 loops=3268)
Hash Cond: (ls.munkalap_statusz_figyelmeztetes_id = msf.munkalap_statusz_figyelmeztetes_id)
Join Filter: (ls.idopont > (now() - (((msf.figyelmeztetes_periodus)::text || ' minutes'::text))::interval))
-> Bitmap Heap Scan on lepes_sorrend ls (cost=680.26..2032.12 rows=1 width=16) (actual time=5.706..5.707 rows=0 loops=3268)
Recheck Cond: (munkalap_statusz_figyelmeztetes_id IS NOT NULL)
Filter: (munkalap_lepes_id = ml.munkalap_lepes_id)
-> Bitmap Index Scan on lepes_sorrend_idx2 (cost=0.00..680.26 rows=36389 width=0) (actual time=1.814..1.814 rows=36337 loops=3268)
Index Cond: (munkalap_statusz_figyelmeztetes_id IS NOT NULL)
-> Hash (cost=1.22..1.22 rows=22 width=8) (actual time=0.009..0.009 rows=22 loops=1)
Buckets: 1024 Batches: 1 Memory Usage: 1kB
-> Seq Scan on munkalap_statusz_figyelmeztetes msf (cost=0.00..1.22 rows=22 width=8) (actual time=0.003..0.004 rows=22 loops=1)
-> Index Scan using pk_munkalap_lepes on munkalap_lepes ml2 (cost=0.00..8.27 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=0.011..0.011 rows=1 loops=12)
Index Cond: (munkalap_lepes_id = ml.munkalap_lepes_id)
Filter: aktualis
-> Index Scan using pk_munkalap on munkalap m (cost=0.00..0.41 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=0.008..0.008 rows=0 loops=3256)
Index Cond: (munkalap_id = ml.munkalap_id)
Filter: ((NOT lezarva) AND (NOT torolve))
-> Index Scan using pk_munkalap_statusz on munkalap_statusz ms (cost=0.00..0.27 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=0.003..0.004 rows=1 loops=61)
Index Cond: (munkalap_statusz_id = ml.munkalap_statusz_id)
SubPlan 2
-> Seq Scan on munkanapok (cost=0.00..16.27 rows=1027 width=4) (actual time=0.008..0.113 rows=1027 loops=1)
Total runtime: 18725.001 ms
The index definition is:
CREATE INDEX idx_munkalap_lepes_aktualis ON hibabejelentes.munkalap_lepes
USING btree (aktualis)
WHERE aktualis;
'aktualis' is a boolean flag, the name meaning 'current' (for those who wondered :)
After playing it for a while I still have no idea how to make it fast... omitting the other conditions makes the query run reasonably fast:
QUERY PLAN
Hash Join (cost=2.01..428.98 rows=3271 width=4) (actual time=0.449..3.780 rows=3268 loops=1)
Hash Cond: (ml.munkalap_statusz_id = ms.munkalap_statusz_id)
-> Index Scan using idx_munkalap_lepes_aktualis on munkalap_lepes ml (cost=0.00..381.99 rows=3271 width=8) (actual time=0.410..2.846 rows=3268 loops=1)
Index Cond: (aktualis = true)
-> Hash (cost=1.45..1.45 rows=45 width=4) (actual time=0.025..0.025 rows=45 loops=1)
Buckets: 1024 Batches: 1 Memory Usage: 2kB
-> Seq Scan on munkalap_statusz ms (cost=0.00..1.45 rows=45 width=4) (actual time=0.007..0.012 rows=45 loops=1)
Total runtime: 3.971 ms
All tables are autovacuumed.
Thanks in advance for any idea.
EDIT: SELECT statement included
CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW hibabejelentes.v_munkalap_figyelmeztetes_kuldes(
munkalap_id)
AS
SELECT ml.munkalap_id
FROM munkalap_lepes ml
JOIN munkalap_statusz ms USING (munkalap_statusz_id)
WHERE ml.aktualis AND
(ml.idopont_tervezett::timestamp without time zone < now() OR
ml.idopont_tervezett IS NULL AND
(ml.idopont +((ms.hatarido || ' minutes' ::text) ::interval)) < now()) AND
NOT (EXISTS (
SELECT ls.munkalap_statusz_figyelmeztetes_id
FROM lepes_sorrend ls
JOIN munkalap_lepes ml2 USING (munkalap_lepes_id)
JOIN munkalap_statusz_figyelmeztetes msf USING (
munkalap_statusz_figyelmeztetes_id)
WHERE ml2.aktualis AND
ml2.munkalap_lepes_id = ml.munkalap_lepes_id AND
ls.munkalap_statusz_figyelmeztetes_id IS NOT NULL AND
ls.idopont >(now() -((msf.figyelmeztetes_periodus ||
' minutes' ::text) ::interval))
)) AND
('now' ::text::date IN (
SELECT munkanapok.datum
FROM munkanapok
)) AND
'now' ::text::time with time zone >=((
SELECT f.ertek::time
without time zone AS
ertek
FROM f_konstansok_select(
'MUNKAIDO_ELEJE' ::text,
'now' ::text::date,
NULL::integer) f(
konstans_id,
konstans_nev, datum,
ertek, torolve,
bolthalozat_id)
)) ::time with time zone AND
'now' ::text::time with time zone <=((
SELECT f.ertek::time
without time zone AS
ertek
FROM f_konstansok_select(
'MUNKAIDO_VEGE' ::text,
'now' ::text::date,
NULL::integer) f(
konstans_id,
konstans_nev, datum,
ertek, torolve,
bolthalozat_id)
)) ::time with time zone;
current_date
instead of'now'::text::date
(although I doubt that it will make a big difference). But the index scan does indeed look very strange