0

We are migrating DB servers from "real" clusters to VMware. The question is with VMware how do you get similar functionality in VMware? Things like failover etc?

Is vMotion the answer? I wonder what other people do, what is considered best practice?

1
  • This question is probably too vague to answer, but anytime you are using a large vendor database and some other third party product (servers, virtualization, etc) you should simply google for a whitepaper. Results for : sql server vmware whitepaper vmware.com/files/pdf/solutions/… Commented May 12, 2016 at 11:55

1 Answer 1

2

vMotion and clustering aren't alternatives for one another. vMotion moves the same "machine" (albeit virtual) from one physical host to another.

This provides some sort of resilience to hardware failure (unless it's the shared SAN bombing out) but you can't fail over to another host if you would like to create a maintenance window with minimal downtime for example. vMotion won't help you if you need to patch the (virtual) servers without downtime.

If you need the clustering for other things than hardware failure resilience I wouldn't rely on the VMware features but I would create 2 VM's on separate physical boxes and create a regular cluster between the 2 VM's.

vMotion adds a few features like being able to move VM's between hosts to redistribute load and hopefully recover from a hardware failure but is not an alternative for clustering. Clustering between 2 VM's is not different from clustering between 2 physical machines.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.